From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, der.herr@hofr.at,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Optimize percpu-rwsem
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:54:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432670062.8196.8.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526114356.609107918@infradead.org>
While at it, I'll go ahead and add this triviality.
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:51:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] doc,locking: Move percpu-rwsem doc into proper subdir
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
Documentation/locking/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt | 27 ---------------------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/locking/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
delete mode 100644 Documentation/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/locking/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt b/Documentation/locking/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d3c824
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/locking/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Percpu rw semaphores
+--------------------
+
+Percpu rw semaphores is a new read-write semaphore design that is
+optimized for locking for reading.
+
+The problem with traditional read-write semaphores is that when multiple
+cores take the lock for reading, the cache line containing the semaphore
+is bouncing between L1 caches of the cores, causing performance
+degradation.
+
+Locking for reading is very fast, it uses RCU and it avoids any atomic
+instruction in the lock and unlock path. On the other hand, locking for
+writing is very expensive, it calls synchronize_rcu() that can take
+hundreds of milliseconds.
+
+The lock is declared with "struct percpu_rw_semaphore" type.
+The lock is initialized percpu_init_rwsem, it returns 0 on success and
+-ENOMEM on allocation failure.
+The lock must be freed with percpu_free_rwsem to avoid memory leak.
+
+The lock is locked for read with percpu_down_read, percpu_up_read and
+for write with percpu_down_write, percpu_up_write.
+
+The idea of using RCU for optimized rw-lock was introduced by
+Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>.
+The code was written by Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
diff --git a/Documentation/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt b/Documentation/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 7d3c824..0000000
--- a/Documentation/percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-Percpu rw semaphores
---------------------
-
-Percpu rw semaphores is a new read-write semaphore design that is
-optimized for locking for reading.
-
-The problem with traditional read-write semaphores is that when multiple
-cores take the lock for reading, the cache line containing the semaphore
-is bouncing between L1 caches of the cores, causing performance
-degradation.
-
-Locking for reading is very fast, it uses RCU and it avoids any atomic
-instruction in the lock and unlock path. On the other hand, locking for
-writing is very expensive, it calls synchronize_rcu() that can take
-hundreds of milliseconds.
-
-The lock is declared with "struct percpu_rw_semaphore" type.
-The lock is initialized percpu_init_rwsem, it returns 0 on success and
--ENOMEM on allocation failure.
-The lock must be freed with percpu_free_rwsem to avoid memory leak.
-
-The lock is locked for read with percpu_down_read, percpu_up_read and
-for write with percpu_down_write, percpu_up_write.
-
-The idea of using RCU for optimized rw-lock was introduced by
-Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>.
-The code was written by Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
--
2.1.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 11:43 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Optimize percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-30 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-30 19:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-30 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-31 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-26 11:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-29 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-29 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-29 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-30 20:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-16 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-30 17:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-30 20:04 ` ring_buffer_attach && cond_synchronize_rcu (Was: percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact) Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-16 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-16 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-16 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-19 17:57 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 18:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Optimize percpu-rwsem Linus Torvalds
2015-05-26 18:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-26 18:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-05-26 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-27 9:28 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-06-05 1:45 ` Al Viro
2015-06-05 21:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-05 22:11 ` Al Viro
2015-06-05 23:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-27 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:54 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432670062.8196.8.camel@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox