From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756785AbbE2StK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 14:49:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:37325 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752882AbbE2Ss7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 14:48:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1432925336.8727.29.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sched_setscheduler() vs idle_balance() race From: Mike Galbraith To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , ktkhai@parallels.com Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 20:48:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1432924227.8727.23.camel@gmail.com> References: <1432799032.3237.119.camel@gmail.com> <20150528135355.GK3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1432824866.3237.198.camel@gmail.com> <20150528152456.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1432924227.8727.23.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org P.S. intel_idle is not all that wonderful on this box. - 78.31% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock ▒ - _raw_spin_lock ▒ - 94.91% tick_broadcast_oneshot_control ▒ intel_idle ▒ cpuidle_enter_state ▒ cpuidle_enter ▒ + cpu_startup_entry ▒ + 1.63% pull_rt_task ▒ + 1.35% __sched_setscheduler ▒ + 1.11% push_rt_task.part.46 ▒ + 2.44% [kernel] [k] native_write_msr_safe