linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>,
	drbd-user@lists.linbit.com, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
	Joshua Morris <josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com>,
	Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 23:02:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433138551.11778.4.camel@hasee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528003627.GD32216@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 01:36 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:42:44PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > Here are fio results of XFS on a DM stripped target with 2 SSDs + 1 HDD.
> > Does it make sense?
> 
> To stripe across devices with different characteristics?
> 
> Some suggestions.
> 
> Prepare 3 kernels.
>   O - Old kernel.
>   M - Old kernel with merge_bvec_fn disabled.
>   N - New kernel.
> 
> You're trying to search for counter-examples to the hypothesis that 
> "Kernel N always outperforms Kernel O".  Then if you find any, trying 
> to show either that the performance impediment is small enough that
> it doesn't matter or that the cases are sufficiently rare or obscure
> that they may be ignored because of the greater benefits of N in much more
> common cases.
> 
> (1) You're looking to set up configurations where kernel O performs noticeably
> better than M.  Then you're comparing the performance of O and N in those
> situations.
> 
> (2) You're looking at other sensible configurations where O and M have
> similar performance, and comparing that with the performance of N.

I didn't find case (1).

But the important thing for this series is to simplify block layer
based on immutable biovecs. I don't expect performance improvement.

Here is the changes statistics.

"68 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 1331 deletions(-)"

I run below 3 test cases to make sure it didn't bring any regressions.
Test environment: 2 NVMe drives on 2 sockets server.
Each case run for 30 minutes.

2) btrfs radi0

mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid0 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1
mount /dev/nvme0n1 /mnt

Then run 8K read.

[global]
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=64
direct=1
runtime=1800
time_based
group_reporting
numjobs=4
rw=read

[job1]
bs=8K
directory=/mnt
size=1G

2) ext4 on MD raid5

mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=2 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1
mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0
mount /dev/md0 /mnt

fio script same as btrfs test

3) xfs on DM stripped target

pvcreate /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1
vgcreate striped_vol_group /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1
lvcreate -i2 -I4 -L250G -nstriped_logical_volume striped_vol_group
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/striped_vol_group/striped_logical_volume
mount /dev/striped_vol_group/striped_logical_volume /mnt

fio script same as btrfs test

------

Results:

	4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
btrfs	1818.6MB/s	1874.1MB/s
ext4	717307KB/s	714030KB/s
xfs	1396.6MB/s	1398.6MB/s



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22 18:18 [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:46   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 14:36   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 15:02     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 15:34       ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-26 23:06         ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27  0:40           ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-27  8:20             ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 16:04       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 17:17         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27 23:42         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-28  0:36           ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-28  5:54             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29  7:05             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29 15:15               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-01  6:02             ` Ming Lin [this message]
2015-06-02 20:59               ` Ming Lin
2015-06-04 21:06                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-04 22:21                   ` Ming Lin
2015-06-05  0:06                     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-05  5:21                       ` Ming Lin
2015-06-09  6:09                   ` Ming Lin
2015-06-10 21:20                     ` Ming Lin
2015-06-10 21:46                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 22:06                         ` Ming Lin
2015-06-12  5:49                           ` Ming Lin
2015-06-18  5:27                         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] block: simplify bio_add_page() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] bcache: remove driver private bio splitting code Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:48   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25  7:03     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25  7:54       ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 14:33           ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 22:32             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 23:03               ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 23:42                 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27  0:38                   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27  8:15                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:49   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 15:02     ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 15:19         ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:35       ` Alex Elder
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: remove bio_get_nr_vecs() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-23 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-24  7:37   ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25 13:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-29  6:39       ` Ming Lin
2015-06-01  6:15   ` Ming Lin
2015-06-03  6:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-03 13:28       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-06-03 17:06         ` Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433138551.11778.4.camel@hasee \
    --to=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpark@posteo.net \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jim@jtan.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).