From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@daterainc.com>
To: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [PATCH-v3 3/4] target: Drop se_lun->lun_active for existing percpu lun_ref
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:21:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433146876-20188-4-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433146876-20188-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com>
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
With se_port_t and t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member being absored into se_lun,
there is no need for an extra atomic_t based reference count for PR
ALL_TG_PT=1 and ALUA access state transition.
Go ahead and use the existing percpu se_lun->lun_ref instead, and
convert the two special cases to percpu_ref_tryget_live() to avoid
se_lun if transport_clear_lun_ref() has already been invoked to
shutdown the se_lun.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
---
drivers/target/target_core_alua.c | 5 +++--
drivers/target/target_core_pr.c | 9 +++++----
drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c | 10 ++++++----
include/target/target_core_base.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
index 0a00873..02d8e1a 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_alua.c
@@ -969,7 +969,8 @@ static void core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work(struct work_struct *work)
* every I_T nexus other than the I_T nexus on which the SET
* TARGET PORT GROUPS command
*/
- atomic_inc_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+ if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&lun->lun_ref))
+ continue;
spin_unlock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&lun->lun_deve_lock);
@@ -998,7 +999,7 @@ static void core_alua_do_transition_tg_pt_work(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_bh(&lun->lun_deve_lock);
spin_lock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
- atomic_dec_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+ percpu_ref_put(&lun->lun_ref);
}
spin_unlock(&tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_lock);
/*
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
index 60624bb..94935ea 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pr.c
@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
*/
spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(lun_tmp, next, &dev->dev_sep_list, lun_dev_link) {
- atomic_inc_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+ if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&lun_tmp->lun_ref))
+ continue;
spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&lun_tmp->lun_deve_lock);
@@ -751,7 +752,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("core_scsi3_lunacl_depend"
"_item() failed\n");
- atomic_dec_mb(&lun->lun_active);
+ percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
kref_put(&deve_tmp->pr_kref, target_pr_kref_release);
goto out;
}
@@ -770,7 +771,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
deve_tmp->mapped_lun, NULL,
sa_res_key, all_tg_pt, aptpl);
if (!pr_reg_atp) {
- atomic_dec_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+ percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
core_scsi3_lunacl_undepend_item(deve_tmp);
goto out;
}
@@ -782,7 +783,7 @@ static struct t10_pr_registration *__core_scsi3_alloc_registration(
spin_unlock_bh(&lun_tmp->lun_deve_lock);
spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
- atomic_dec_mb(&lun_tmp->lun_active);
+ percpu_ref_put(&lun_tmp->lun_ref);
}
spin_unlock(&dev->se_port_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
index 5b30940..b9fcf2c 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
@@ -607,7 +607,6 @@ struct se_lun *core_tpg_alloc_lun(
mutex_init(&lun->lun_tg_pt_md_mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_link);
spin_lock_init(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
- atomic_set(&lun->lun_active, 0);
lun->lun_tpg = tpg;
return lun;
@@ -667,13 +666,16 @@ void core_tpg_remove_lun(
struct se_device *dev = rcu_dereference_raw(lun->lun_se_dev);
core_clear_lun_from_tpg(lun, tpg);
+ /*
+ * Wait for any active I/O references to percpu se_lun->lun_ref to
+ * be released. Also, se_lun->lun_ref is now used by PR and ALUA
+ * logic when referencing a remote target port during ALL_TGT_PT=1
+ * and generating UNIT_ATTENTIONs for ALUA access state transition.
+ */
transport_clear_lun_ref(lun);
mutex_lock(&tpg->tpg_lun_mutex);
if (lun->lun_se_dev) {
- while (atomic_read(&lun->lun_active))
- cpu_relax();
-
target_detach_tg_pt_gp(lun);
spin_lock(&dev->se_port_lock);
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
index b82a989..eefc2b0 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
@@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ struct se_lun {
struct t10_alua_tg_pt_gp *lun_tg_pt_gp;
spinlock_t lun_tg_pt_gp_lock;
- atomic_t lun_active;
struct se_portal_group *lun_tpg;
struct scsi_port_stats lun_stats;
struct config_group lun_group;
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 8:21 [PATCH-v3 0/4] target: Eliminate se_port + t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-06-01 8:21 ` [PATCH-v3 1/4] target: Subsume se_port + t10_alua_tg_pt_gp_member into se_lun Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-06-01 8:21 ` [PATCH-v3 2/4] target: Drop lun_sep_lock for se_lun->lun_se_dev RCU usage Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-06-01 8:21 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2015-06-01 8:21 ` [PATCH-v3 4/4] target: Drop unnecessary core_tpg_register TFO parameter Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1433146876-20188-4-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com \
--to=nab@daterainc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).