From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
To: mmarek@suse.cz, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scripts/package/Makefile: rpmbuild is needed for rpm targets
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 13:19:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433794748-6570-1-git-send-email-jim.epost@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+r1ZhiyQbakrxr4saPE_mFjwjGG4aJxLHm3oCvqD=4=ByBA_w@mail.gmail.com>
Before rpm release 4.1, in 2002, either the rpm command or the
rpmbuild command could be used in the rpm-pkg or binrpm-pkg targets,
and the Makefile chose the rpm command if the rpmbuild command wasn't
found.
After release 4.1, however, the rpm command could no longer be used in
place of the rpmbuild command. As the rpmbuild command is not
installed by default, this can lead to failures with the rpm-pkg and
binrpm-pkg targets:
rpm --define "_builddir ." --target \
x86_64 -bb ./binkernel.spec
rpm --target: unknown option
scripts/package/Makefile:60: recipe for target 'binrpm-pkg' failed
Change the Makefile to use rpmbuild unconditionally to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
---
scripts/package/Makefile | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/package/Makefile b/scripts/package/Makefile
index 99ca6e7..8b11d5a 100644
--- a/scripts/package/Makefile
+++ b/scripts/package/Makefile
@@ -21,10 +21,6 @@
# Note that the rpm-pkg target cannot be used with KBUILD_OUTPUT,
# but the binrpm-pkg target can; for some reason O= gets ignored.
-# Do we have rpmbuild, otherwise fall back to the older rpm
-RPM := $(shell if [ -x "/usr/bin/rpmbuild" ]; then echo rpmbuild; \
- else echo rpm; fi)
-
# Remove hyphens since they have special meaning in RPM filenames
KERNELPATH := kernel-$(subst -,_,$(KERNELRELEASE))
# Include only those top-level files that are needed by make, plus the GPL copy
@@ -51,7 +47,7 @@ rpm-pkg rpm: FORCE
rm -f $(objtree)/.scmversion
$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/mkversion > $(objtree)/.tmp_version
mv -f $(objtree)/.tmp_version $(objtree)/.version
- $(RPM) $(RPMOPTS) --target $(UTS_MACHINE) -ta $(KERNELPATH).tar.gz
+ rpmbuild --target $(UTS_MACHINE) -ta $(KERNELPATH).tar.gz
rm $(KERNELPATH).tar.gz kernel.spec
# binrpm-pkg
@@ -62,7 +58,7 @@ binrpm-pkg: FORCE
$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/mkversion > $(objtree)/.tmp_version
mv -f $(objtree)/.tmp_version $(objtree)/.version
- $(RPM) $(RPMOPTS) --define "_builddir $(objtree)" --target \
+ rpmbuild --define "_builddir $(objtree)" --target \
$(UTS_MACHINE) -bb $(objtree)/binkernel.spec
rm binkernel.spec
--
2.4.2
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+r1ZhiyQbakrxr4saPE_mFjwjGG4aJxLHm3oCvqD=4=ByBA_w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-08 20:19 ` Jim Davis [this message]
2015-06-15 14:12 ` [PATCH] scripts/package/Makefile: rpmbuild is needed for rpm targets Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1433794748-6570-1-git-send-email-jim.epost@gmail.com \
--to=jim.epost@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox