linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>,
	Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Joshua Morris <josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>,
	drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 23:09:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433830169.1197.6.camel@hasee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150604210617.GA23710@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 17:06 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> We need to test on large HW raid setups like a Netapp filer (or even
> local SAS drives connected via some SAS controller).  Like a 8+2 drive
> RAID6 or 8+1 RAID5 setup.  Testing with MD raid on JBOD setups with 8
> devices is also useful.  It is larger RAID setups that will be more
> sensitive to IO sizes being properly aligned on RAID stripe and/or chunk
> size boundaries.

Here are tests results of xfs/ext4/btrfs read/write on HW RAID6/MD RAID6/DM stripe target.
Each case run 0.5 hour, so it took 36 hours to finish all the tests on 4.1-rc4 and 4.1-rc4-patched kernels.

No performance regressions were introduced.

Test server: Dell R730xd(2 sockets/48 logical cpus/264G memory)
HW RAID6/MD RAID6/DM stripe target were configured with 10 HDDs, each 280G
Stripe size 64k and 128k were tested.

devs="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk"
spare_devs="/dev/sdl /dev/sdm"
stripe_size=64 (or 128)

MD RAID6 was created by:
mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=6 --raid-devices=10 $devs --spare-devices=2 $spare_devs -c $stripe_size

DM stripe target was created by:
pvcreate $devs
vgcreate striped_vol_group $devs
lvcreate -i10 -I${stripe_size} -L2T -nstriped_logical_volume striped_vol_group

Here is an example of fio script for stripe size 128k:
[global]
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=64
direct=1
runtime=1800
time_based
group_reporting
numjobs=48
gtod_reduce=0
norandommap
write_iops_log=fs

[job1]
bs=1280K
directory=/mnt
size=5G
rw=read

All results here: http://minggr.net/pub/20150608/fio_results/

Results summary:

1. HW RAID6: stripe size 64k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	821.23		812.20  -1.09%
xfs write:	753.16		754.42  +0.16%
ext4 read:	827.80		834.82  +0.84%
ext4 write:	783.08		777.58  -0.70%
btrfs read:	859.26		871.68  +1.44%
btrfs write:	815.63		844.40  +3.52%

2. HW RAID6: stripe size 128k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	948.27		979.11  +3.25%
xfs write:	820.78		819.94  -0.10%
ext4 read:	978.35		997.92  +2.00%
ext4 write:	853.51		847.97  -0.64%
btrfs read:	1013.1		1015.6  +0.24%
btrfs write:	854.43		850.42  -0.46%

3. MD RAID6: stripe size 64k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	847.34		869.43  +2.60%
xfs write:	198.67		199.03  +0.18%
ext4 read:	763.89		767.79  +0.51%
ext4 write:	281.44		282.83  +0.49%
btrfs read:	756.02		743.69  -1.63%
btrfs write:	268.37		265.93  -0.90%

4. MD RAID6: stripe size 128k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	993.04		1014.1  +2.12%
xfs write:	293.06		298.95  +2.00%
ext4 read:	1019.6		1020.9  +0.12%
ext4 write:	371.51		371.47  -0.01%
btrfs read:	1000.4		1020.8  +2.03%
btrfs write:	241.08		246.77  +2.36%

5. DM: stripe size 64k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	1084.4		1080.1  -0.39%
xfs write:	1071.1		1063.4  -0.71%
ext4 read:	991.54		1003.7  +1.22%
ext4 write:	1069.7		1052.2  -1.63%
btrfs read:	1076.1		1082.1  +0.55%
btrfs write:	968.98		965.07  -0.40%

6. DM: stripe size 128k
		4.1-rc4		4.1-rc4-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	1020.4		1066.1  +4.47%
xfs write:	1058.2		1066.6  +0.79%
ext4 read:	990.72		988.19  -0.25%
ext4 write:	1050.4		1070.2  +1.88%
btrfs read:	1080.9		1074.7  -0.57%
btrfs write:	975.10		972.76  -0.23%






  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22 18:18 [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:46   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 14:36   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 15:02     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 15:34       ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-26 23:06         ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27  0:40           ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-27  8:20             ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 16:04       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 17:17         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27 23:42         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-28  0:36           ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-28  5:54             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29  7:05             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29 15:15               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-01  6:02             ` Ming Lin
2015-06-02 20:59               ` Ming Lin
2015-06-04 21:06                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-04 22:21                   ` Ming Lin
2015-06-05  0:06                     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-05  5:21                       ` Ming Lin
2015-06-09  6:09                   ` Ming Lin [this message]
2015-06-10 21:20                     ` Ming Lin
2015-06-10 21:46                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 22:06                         ` Ming Lin
2015-06-12  5:49                           ` Ming Lin
2015-06-18  5:27                         ` Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] block: simplify bio_add_page() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] bcache: remove driver private bio splitting code Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:48   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25  7:03     ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25  7:54       ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 14:33           ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 22:32             ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 23:03               ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 23:42                 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27  0:38                   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27  8:15                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely Ming Lin
2015-05-25  5:49   ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 15:02     ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 15:19         ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:35       ` Alex Elder
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: remove bio_get_nr_vecs() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-23 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-24  7:37   ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25 13:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-29  6:39       ` Ming Lin
2015-06-01  6:15   ` Ming Lin
2015-06-03  6:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-03 13:28       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-06-03 17:06         ` Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433830169.1197.6.camel@hasee \
    --to=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpark@posteo.net \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jim@jtan.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=josh.h.morris@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=pjk1939@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).