From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: Copy the shadow-timekeeper over the real timekeeper last
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:05:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434560753-7441-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> (raw)
The fix in d151832650ed9 (time: Move clock_was_set_seq update
before updating shadow-timekeeper) was unfortunately incomplete.
The main gist of that change was to do the shadow-copy update
last, so that any state changes were properly duplicated, and
we wouldn't accidentally have stale data in the shadow.
Unfortunately in the main update_wall_time() logic, we update
use the shadow-timekeeper to calculate the next update values,
then while holding the lock, copy the shadow-timekeeper over,
then call timekeeping_update() to do some additional
bookkeeping, (skipping the shadow mirror). The bug with this is
the additional bookkeeping isn't all read-only, and some
changes timkeeper state. Thus we might then overwrite this state
change on the next update.
To avoid this problem, do the timekeeping_update() on the
shadow-timekeeper prior to copying the full state over to
the real-timekeeper.
This avoids problems with both the clock_was_set_seq and
next_leap_ktime being overwritten and possibly the
fast-timekeepers as well.
Many thanks to Prarit for his rigorous testing, which discovered
this problem, along with Prarit and Daniel's work validating this
fix.
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
(This patch applies to tip/timers/core)
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 5d67ffb..30b7a40 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1853,8 +1853,9 @@ void update_wall_time(void)
* memcpy under the tk_core.seq against one before we start
* updating.
*/
+ timekeeping_update(tk, clock_set);
memcpy(real_tk, tk, sizeof(*tk));
- timekeeping_update(real_tk, clock_set);
+ /* The memcpy must come last. Do not put anything here! */
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 17:05 John Stultz [this message]
2015-06-18 7:31 ` [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Copy the shadow-timekeeper over the real timekeeper last tip-bot for John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434560753-7441-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox