From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: establish new mapping before cpu starts handling requests
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 02:14:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435338857.30650.6.camel@mita-ThinkPad-T540p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC5umyjOZgRz2FF0skXMuKFLMtbnMO5Hdx0pkvBUaHk2+QfAng@mail.gmail.com>
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>:
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
> > Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
> >> (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1). Now CPU1 is just onlined and
> >> a request is inserted into ctx1->rq_list and set bit0 in pending
> >> bitmap as ctx1->index_hw is still zero.
> >>
> >> And then while running hw queue, flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is set
> >> in pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in
> >> hctx->ctxs[0].rq_list. But htx->ctxs[0] is ctx0, so the request in
> >> ctx1->rq_list is ignored.
> >
> > Per current design, the request should have been inserted into ctx0 instead
> > of ctx1 because ctx1 isn't mapped yet even though ctx1->cpu becomes ONLINE.
> >
> > So how about the following patch? which looks much simpler.
>
> OK, I'll try this patch to see if the problem disappears.
This doesn't fix the problem. Because:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index f537796..2f45b73 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -1034,7 +1034,12 @@ void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head, bool run_queue,
> > struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx, *current_ctx;
> >
> > current_ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
> > - if (!cpu_online(ctx->cpu))
> > + /*
> > + * ctx->cpu may become ONLINE but ctx hasn't been mapped to
> > + * hctx yet because there is a tiny race window between
> > + * ctx->cpu ONLINE and doing the remap
> > + */
> > + if (!blk_mq_ctx_mapped(ctx))
> > rq->mq_ctx = ctx = current_ctx;
The process running on just onlined CPU1 in the above example can
satisfy this condition and current_ctx will be ctx1. So the same
scenario can happen (the request is ignored by flush_busy_ctxs).
I found simple alternative solution that assigns the offline CPUs
unique ctx->index_hw.
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 594eea0..a8fcfbf 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1787,10 +1787,11 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct
request_queue *q)
*/
queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) {
/* If the cpu isn't online, the cpu is mapped to first hctx */
- if (!cpu_online(i))
- continue;
+ if (!cpu_online(i) && cpu_possible(i))
+ hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, 0);
+ else
+ hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
- hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->cpumask);
ctx->index_hw = hctx->nr_ctx;
hctx->ctxs[hctx->nr_ctx++] = ctx;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-26 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-21 13:52 [PATCH 0/4] blk-mq: fix race conditions on cpu hotplug handling Akinobu Mita
2015-06-21 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] blk-mq: fix sysfs registration/unregistration race Akinobu Mita
2015-06-24 8:59 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-21 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] blk-mq: fix q->mq_map access race Akinobu Mita
2015-06-24 9:23 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-21 13:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: establish new mapping before cpu starts handling requests Akinobu Mita
2015-06-24 9:46 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-24 14:34 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-06-24 16:24 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-25 2:56 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-06-25 8:07 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-25 12:49 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-06-25 15:40 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-25 23:35 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-06-26 17:14 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
2015-06-27 16:08 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-29 14:25 ` Akinobu Mita
2015-06-30 9:06 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-21 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: fix mq_usage_counter race when switching to percpu mode Akinobu Mita
2015-06-24 12:35 ` Ming Lei
2015-06-29 14:31 ` Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435338857.30650.6.camel@mita-ThinkPad-T540p \
--to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox