From: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vikas.shivappa@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, matt.fleming@intel.com,
will.auld@intel.com, glenn.p.williamson@intel.com,
kanaka.d.juvva@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation enumeration
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:21:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435789270-27010-10-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435789270-27010-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
Cache Allocation on hsw(haswell) needs to be enumerated separately as
HSW does not have support for CPUID enumeration for Cache Allocation.
Cache Allocation is only supported on certain HSW SKUs. This patch does
a probe test for hsw CPUs by writing a CLOSid(Class of service id) into
high 32 bits of IA32_PQR_MSR and see if the bits stick. The probe test
is only done after confirming that the CPU is HSW. Other HSW specific
quirks are:
- HSW requires the L3 cache bit mask to be at least two bits.
- Maximum CLOSids supported is always 4.
- Maximum bits support in cache bit mask is always 20.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
index 1f9716c..790cdba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ struct intel_rdt rdt_root_group;
struct static_key __read_mostly rdt_enable_key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
/*
+ * Minimum bits required in Cache bitmask.
+ */
+static unsigned int min_bitmask_len = 1;
+
+/*
* Mask of CPUs for writing CBM values. We only need one CPU per-socket.
*/
static cpumask_t rdt_cpumask;
@@ -50,6 +55,56 @@ static cpumask_t tmp_cpumask;
#define rdt_for_each_child(pos_css, parent_ir) \
css_for_each_child((pos_css), &(parent_ir)->css)
+/*
+ * cache_alloc_hsw_probe() - Have to do probe test for Intel haswell CPUs as it
+ * does not have CPUID enumeration support for Cache allocation.
+ *
+ * Probes by writing to the high 32 bits(CLOSid) of the IA32_PQR_MSR and
+ * testing if the bits stick. Then hardcode the max CLOS and max
+ * bitmask length on hsw. The minimum cache bitmask length allowed for
+ * HSW is 2 bits.
+ */
+static inline bool cache_alloc_hsw_probe(void)
+{
+ u32 l, h_old, h_new, h_tmp;
+
+ if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, &l, &h_old))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Default value is always 0 if feature is present.
+ */
+ h_tmp = h_old ^ 0x1U;
+ if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, l, h_tmp) ||
+ rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, &l, &h_new))
+ return false;
+
+ if (h_tmp != h_new)
+ return false;
+
+ wrmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, l, h_old);
+
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_closid = 4;
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_cbm_len = 20;
+ min_bitmask_len = 2;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool cache_alloc_supported(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Probe test for Haswell CPUs.
+ */
+ if (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model == 0x3f)
+ return cache_alloc_hsw_probe();
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline void closid_get(u32 closid)
{
struct clos_cbm_map *ccm = &ccmap[closid];
@@ -160,7 +215,7 @@ static inline bool cbm_is_contiguous(unsigned long var)
unsigned long maxcbm = MAX_CBM_LENGTH;
unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit;
- if (!var)
+ if (bitmap_weight(&var, maxcbm) < min_bitmask_len)
return false;
first_bit = find_next_bit(&var, maxcbm, 0);
@@ -180,7 +235,8 @@ static int cbm_validate(struct intel_rdt *ir, unsigned long cbmvalue)
int err = 0;
if (!cbm_is_contiguous(cbmvalue)) {
- pr_err("bitmask should have >= 1 bit and be contiguous\n");
+ pr_err("bitmask should have >=%d bits and be contiguous\n",
+ min_bitmask_len);
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
@@ -409,7 +465,7 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
int err = 0, i;
size_t sizeb;
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3)) {
+ if (!cache_alloc_supported(c)) {
rdt_root_group.css.ss->disabled = 1;
return -ENODEV;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 22:21 [PATCH V12 0/9] Hot cpu handling changes to cqm, rapl and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/intel_cqm: Modify hot cpu notification handling Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-31 23:19 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/intel_rapl: Modify hot cpu notification handling for RAPL Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/intel_rdt: Cache Allocation documentation and cgroup usage guide Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-04 20:41 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 23:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-29 0:06 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 1:28 ` Auld, Will
2015-07-29 19:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-30 17:47 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-30 20:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-31 15:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-02 15:48 ` Martin Kletzander
2015-08-03 15:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-03 18:22 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-30 20:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-30 23:03 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-31 14:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-31 16:41 ` [summary] " Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-31 18:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-29 20:07 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 22:07 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/intel_rdt: Add new cgroup and Class of service management Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 17:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30 18:01 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 17:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30 18:10 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-30 19:44 ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-31 15:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-02 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-03 20:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-04 12:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-04 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-04 18:32 ` Tejun Heo
2015-07-31 16:24 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-02 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-04 18:50 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-04 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-05 2:21 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-05 15:46 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-06 20:58 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-07 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-05 12:22 ` Matt Fleming
2015-08-05 16:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-06 0:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-06 20:46 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-07 13:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-18 0:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-21 0:06 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-21 0:13 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-22 2:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-08-23 18:47 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-24 13:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for cache bit mask management Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 22:08 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-28 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30 17:54 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/intel_rdt: Implement scheduling support for Intel RDT Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30 18:16 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/intel_rdt: Hot cpu support for Cache Allocation Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-31 23:21 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-01 22:21 ` Vikas Shivappa [this message]
2015-07-29 16:35 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation enumeration Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 20:49 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30 18:45 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-13 17:13 ` [PATCH V12 0/9] Hot cpu handling changes to cqm, rapl and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-16 12:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-24 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-24 18:28 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-24 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-24 18:45 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-29 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 22:53 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-07-24 18:32 ` Vikas Shivappa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-06 21:55 [PATCH V13 0/9] Intel cache allocation and Hot cpu handling changes to cqm, rapl Vikas Shivappa
2015-08-06 21:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation enumeration Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-25 19:25 [PATCH V11 0/9] Hot cpu handling changes to cqm,rapl and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-25 19:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation enumeration Vikas Shivappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435789270-27010-10-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--to=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=glenn.p.williamson@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kanaka.d.juvva@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=will.auld@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).