public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mlin@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2015 00:11:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436166674-31362-6-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436166674-31362-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>

From: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>

The split code in blkdev_issue_discard() can go away now
that any driver that cares does the split.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
---
 block/blk-lib.c | 73 +++++++++++----------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 7688ee3..3bf3c4a 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -43,34 +43,17 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
-	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
-	int alignment;
 	struct bio_batch bb;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 
-	if (!q)
+	if (!q || !nr_sects)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
-	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
-
-	/*
-	 * Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
-	 * granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
-	 */
-	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
-	if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
-		/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-
 	if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE) {
 		if (!blk_queue_secdiscard(q))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -82,52 +65,24 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	bb.wait = &wait;
 
 	blk_start_plug(&plug);
-	while (nr_sects) {
-		unsigned int req_sects;
-		sector_t end_sect, tmp;
 
-		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
-		if (!bio) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
+	bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
+	if (!bio) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_discard_sectors);
-
-		/*
-		 * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
-		 * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
-		 */
-		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
-		tmp = end_sect;
-		if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
-		    sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
-			end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
-			sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
-			end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
-			req_sects = end_sect - sector;
-		}
+	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
+	bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
+	bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
+	bio->bi_private = &bb;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
-		bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
-		bio->bi_private = &bb;
+	bio->bi_iter.bi_size = nr_sects << 9;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = req_sects << 9;
-		nr_sects -= req_sects;
-		sector = end_sect;
+	atomic_inc(&bb.done);
+	submit_bio(type, bio);
 
-		atomic_inc(&bb.done);
-		submit_bio(type, bio);
-
-		/*
-		 * We can loop for a long time in here, if someone does
-		 * full device discards (like mkfs). Be nice and allow
-		 * us to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt
-		 * is disabled.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-	}
+out:
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 
 	/* Wait for bios in-flight */
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-06  7:11 [PATCH v5 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] block: simplify bio_add_page() mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] bcache: remove driver private bio splitting code mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` mlin [this message]
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] block: remove bio_get_nr_vecs() mlin
2015-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios mlin
2015-07-13  5:12 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin
2015-07-13 15:35   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-14 20:51     ` Ming Lin
2015-07-24 19:50       ` Kent Overstreet
2015-07-16  7:06     ` Ming Lin
2015-07-16 13:13       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-07-23 18:21     ` Ming Lin
2015-07-27 17:50       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-07-27 22:11         ` Ming Lin
2015-07-27 22:16           ` Ming Lin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-06  7:44 [PATCH v5 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-07-06  7:44 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard Ming Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436166674-31362-6-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org \
    --to=mlin@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dpark@posteo.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox