From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] kmod: Handle UMH_WAIT_PROC from system unbound workqueue
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:07:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436465237-22031-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436465237-22031-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
The UMH_WAIT_PROC handler runs in its own thread for obsolete reasons.
We couldn't launch and then wait for the exec kernel thread completion
without blocking other usermodehelper queued jobs since khelper was
implemented as a singlthread ordered workqueue.
But now we replaced khelper with generic system unbound workqueues which
can handle concurrent blocking jobs.
So lets run it from the workqueue.
CHECK: I'm just worried about the signal handler that gets tweaked
and also the call to sys_wait() that might fiddle with internals. The
system workqueue must continue to work without surprise for other
works.
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index d190178..a8bf872 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -265,9 +265,8 @@ out:
}
/* Handles UMH_WAIT_PROC. */
-static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
+static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
{
- struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
pid_t pid;
/* If SIGCLD is ignored sys_wait4 won't populate the status. */
@@ -281,9 +280,9 @@ static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
* Normally it is bogus to call wait4() from in-kernel because
* wait4() wants to write the exit code to a userspace address.
* But call_usermodehelper_exec_sync() always runs as kernel
- * thread and put_user() to a kernel address works OK for kernel
- * threads, due to their having an mm_segment_t which spans the
- * entire address space.
+ * thread (workqueue) and put_user() to a kernel address works
+ * OK for kernel threads, due to their having an mm_segment_t
+ * which spans the entire address space.
*
* Thus the __user pointer cast is valid here.
*/
@@ -299,7 +298,6 @@ static int call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(void *data)
}
umh_complete(sub_info);
- do_exit(0);
}
/*
@@ -316,18 +314,18 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct subprocess_info *sub_info =
container_of(work, struct subprocess_info, work);
- pid_t pid;
- if (sub_info->wait & UMH_WAIT_PROC)
- pid = kernel_thread(call_usermodehelper_exec_sync, sub_info,
- CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD);
- else
+ if (sub_info->wait & UMH_WAIT_PROC) {
+ call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(sub_info);
+ } else {
+ pid_t pid;
+
pid = kernel_thread(call_usermodehelper_exec_async, sub_info,
SIGCHLD);
-
- if (pid < 0) {
- sub_info->retval = pid;
- umh_complete(sub_info);
+ if (pid < 0) {
+ sub_info->retval = pid;
+ umh_complete(sub_info);
+ }
}
}
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 18:07 [PATCH 0/5] kmod: Simplifications and cleanups v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] kmod: Bunch of internal functions renames Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 22:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-10 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-10 14:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-10 17:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-10 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-10 18:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-10 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-14 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] kmod: Add up-to-date explanations on the purpose of each asynchronous levels Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 18:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] kmod: Remove unecessary explicit wide CPU affinity setting Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-09 18:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-07-09 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] kmod: Handle UMH_WAIT_PROC from system unbound workqueue Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-10 13:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436465237-22031-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox