* [PATCH 1/2] tty: Replace smp_rmb/smp_wmb with smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release
@ 2015-07-13 0:50 Peter Hurley
2015-07-13 0:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty: buffers: Move hidden buffer index advance into outer loop Peter Hurley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Hurley @ 2015-07-13 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, linux-kernel, Peter Hurley
Clarify flip buffer producer/consumer operation; the use of
smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() more clearly indicates
which memory access requires a barrier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
index 4cf263d..25ba5af 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -291,12 +291,11 @@ static int __tty_buffer_request_room(struct tty_port *port, size_t size,
n->flags = flags;
buf->tail = n;
b->commit = b->used;
- /* paired w/ barrier in flush_to_ldisc(); ensures the
+ /* paired w/ acquire in flush_to_ldisc(); ensures the
* latest commit value can be read before the head is
* advanced to the next buffer
*/
- smp_wmb();
- b->next = n;
+ smp_store_release(&b->next, n);
} else if (change)
size = 0;
else
@@ -488,12 +487,11 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
if (atomic_read(&buf->priority))
break;
- next = head->next;
- /* paired w/ barrier in __tty_buffer_request_room();
+ /* paired w/ release in __tty_buffer_request_room();
* ensures commit value read is not stale if the head
* is advancing to the next buffer
*/
- smp_rmb();
+ next = smp_load_acquire(&head->next);
count = head->commit - head->read;
if (!count) {
if (next == NULL) {
--
2.4.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] tty: buffers: Move hidden buffer index advance into outer loop
2015-07-13 0:50 [PATCH 1/2] tty: Replace smp_rmb/smp_wmb with smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release Peter Hurley
@ 2015-07-13 0:50 ` Peter Hurley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Hurley @ 2015-07-13 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Jiri Slaby, linux-kernel, Peter Hurley
The advance of the 'read' buffer index belongs in the outer
flip buffer consume loop, with the other buffer index arithmetic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
index 25ba5af..5a3fa89 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -444,7 +444,6 @@ receive_buf(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_buffer *head, int count)
if (count)
disc->ops->receive_buf(tty, p, f, count);
}
- head->read += count;
return count;
}
@@ -506,6 +505,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
count = receive_buf(tty, head, count);
if (!count)
break;
+ head->read += count;
}
mutex_unlock(&buf->lock);
--
2.4.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-13 0:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-13 0:50 [PATCH 1/2] tty: Replace smp_rmb/smp_wmb with smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release Peter Hurley
2015-07-13 0:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty: buffers: Move hidden buffer index advance into outer loop Peter Hurley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox