From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA35F2C11E6; Mon, 11 May 2026 21:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778536455; cv=none; b=c5HzpyTd05ijEVWRp77+c0jjLn3ErTzJc+hPhRmY/2gYU+pCBjVYGK5G4ssdFbLz8tXrjWovMbxhj3Zb9oBzBUkf4cdPFPxVOLyWivjf9FOWc8sQpncklh9ffitrZ5yZmm5jOz/WqQnTqrC9MTwGzP11qXNL4rOlFKpxOmnRBJA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778536455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RomqOVCJ74bU+jz8D6wGQX7OqLfegoqSF+qw3sa8MCk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XZIDkpzLa7SYsD4X+vU4MOxBYp8GfpKwnFxDPOvN1Qp5N9mNmiwDLtfXxSH7XUR6ciVle0zzNLDOAjfdxHj+k0R8/GBzZe++gSeZJ1fbzTaadrde9LfCfqOUZCB7MnIgqgMiGYcuidKLyg0Ry3BXuXo13d/QEUJu604ljQWmrJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Us4oqDCG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Us4oqDCG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB72CC2BCB0; Mon, 11 May 2026 21:54:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778536455; bh=RomqOVCJ74bU+jz8D6wGQX7OqLfegoqSF+qw3sa8MCk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Us4oqDCGnv65A5+Y7h5uCsUqyxPpZSgNVDTcHgk4KiVvJ8T/1H4NeZZR3Hn7INP1O bSkUM4sPXjLamRNTYLrMUHUI6LH09zegpOT6z92a+mM/1PJOxyL7k/PQ9qrerWwHJo I46d0tXzHeEozot3Mbwy0eG6gMXhE9IQlxQBgnHMLB3zmJVHS0Zhmuk/rKIUFL50o6 Q1sMZFAAQHpIrZI7rVHszB0izhJSl12+0kcPzIJbvReDaxu2Tk66FwRbXx4wc+FmSW Zqv/sv8raTJJvtlgB5Mqirccae4f53qzzMk35U5wCl1mvzCIN6gMcbUuZyy7EPrd0L ZkXldJTNemaDQ== Message-ID: <1436af33-87d8-4070-ae67-a6a290fc0240@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 06:54:11 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] scsi: scsi_devinfo: extend BLIST_NO_LUN_1F to MATSHITA and NEC PD-1 variants To: Hannes Reinecke , Phil Pemberton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Cassel , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" References: <20260426190920.2051289-1-philpem@philpem.me.uk> <20260426190920.2051289-8-philpem@philpem.me.uk> <566ea0c5-3d8b-4ce4-8d42-e97ecabe5f9d@philpem.me.uk> Content-Language: en-US From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/8/26 15:02, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Only that these are optional to the feature work and untested as I don't >> have hardware. I believe these drives use the same PD-1 mechanism and >> firmware so should behave the same, but I can't prove it. >> >> The intent was to allow the 1-6 set to be merged (as these are tested) >> without 7/7 (which is not) to minimise the risk of regressions. >> > So drop it, then. > We can always add it later once someone shows up who actually has the > hardware. I agreee, let's drop this one and patch only once it can be confirmed that the change is needed. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research