From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754309AbbGVEgf (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:36:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:38220 "EHLO mail-wi0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752208AbbGVEgd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1437539790.3106.42.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] soft lockup: kill realtime threads before panic From: Mike Galbraith To: Spencer Baugh Cc: Don Zickus , Andrew Morton , Ulrich Obergfell , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Jones , chai wen , Chris Metcalf , Stephane Eranian , open list , Joern Engel , Spencer Baugh , Joern Engel Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:36:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1437516477-30554-5-git-send-email-sbaugh@catern.com> References: <1437516477-30554-5-git-send-email-sbaugh@catern.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 15:07 -0700, Spencer Baugh wrote: > We have observed cases where the soft lockup detector triggered, but no > kernel bug existed. Instead we had a buggy realtime thread that > monopolized a cpu. So let's kill the responsible party and not panic > the entire system. If you don't tell the kernel to panic, it won't, and if you don't remove its leash (the throttle), your not so tame rt beast won't maul you. -Mike