From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arc-linux-dev@synopsys.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based rwlock
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:33:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438596188-10875-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438596188-10875-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
With LLOCK/SCOND, the rwlock counter can be atomically updated w/o need
for a guarding spin lock.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
---
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 4f6c90a0a68a..9a7a7293f127 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -75,6 +75,177 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
smp_mb();
}
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
+ */
+
+static inline void arch_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * zero means writer holds the lock exclusively, deny Reader.
+ * Otherwise grant lock to first/subseq reader
+ *
+ * if (rw->counter > 0) {
+ * rw->counter--;
+ * ret = 1;
+ * }
+ */
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brls %[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 1b\n" /* <= 0: spin while write locked */
+ " sub %[val], %[val], 1 \n" /* reader lock */
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brls %[val], %[WR_LOCKED], 4f\n" /* <= 0: already write locked, bail */
+ " sub %[val], %[val], 1 \n" /* counter-- */
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n" /* retry if collided with someone */
+ " mov %[got_it], 1 \n"
+ " \n"
+ "4: ; --- done --- \n"
+
+ : [val] "=&r" (val),
+ [got_it] "+&r" (got_it)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * If reader(s) hold lock (lock < __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ * deny writer. Otherwise if unlocked grant to writer
+ * Hence the claim that Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers.
+ * (can be starved for an indefinite time by readers).
+ *
+ * if (rw->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__) {
+ * rw->counter = 0;
+ * ret = 1;
+ * }
+ */
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brne %[val], %[UNLOCKED], 1b \n" /* while !UNLOCKED spin */
+ " mov %[val], %[WR_LOCKED] \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [UNLOCKED] "ir" (__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
+static inline int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val, got_it = 0;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " brne %[val], %[UNLOCKED], 4f \n" /* !UNLOCKED, bail */
+ " mov %[val], %[WR_LOCKED] \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n" /* retry if collided with someone */
+ " mov %[got_it], 1 \n"
+ " \n"
+ "4: ; --- done --- \n"
+
+ : [val] "=&r" (val),
+ [got_it] "+&r" (got_it)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [UNLOCKED] "ir" (__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__),
+ [WR_LOCKED] "ir" (0)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ return got_it;
+}
+
+static inline void arch_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * rw->counter++;
+ */
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " add %[val], %[val], 1 \n"
+ " scond %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter))
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ unsigned int val;
+
+ smp_mb();
+
+ /*
+ * rw->counter = __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__;
+ */
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ "1: llock %[val], [%[rwlock]] \n"
+ " scond %[UNLOCKED], [%[rwlock]]\n"
+ " bnz 1b \n"
+ " \n"
+ : [val] "=&r" (val)
+ : [rwlock] "r" (&(rw->counter)),
+ [UNLOCKED] "r" (__ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
@@ -148,23 +319,14 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
smp_mb();
}
-#endif
-
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
+ * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
*
* The spinlock itself is contained in @counter and access to it is
* serialized with @lock_mutex.
- *
- * Unfair locking as Writers could be starved indefinitely by Reader(s)
*/
-/* Would read_trylock() succeed? */
-#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter > 0)
-
-/* Would write_trylock() succeed? */
-#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
-
/* 1 - lock taken successfully */
static inline int arch_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
@@ -235,6 +397,11 @@ static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
arch_spin_unlock(&(rw->lock_mutex));
}
+#endif
+
+#define arch_read_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter > 0)
+#define arch_write_can_lock(x) ((x)->counter == __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__)
+
#define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock)
#define arch_write_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_write_lock(lock)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
index 662627ced4f2..4e1ef5f650c6 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ typedef struct {
*/
typedef struct {
volatile unsigned int counter;
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC
arch_spinlock_t lock_mutex;
+#endif
} arch_rwlock_t;
#define __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED__ 0x01000000
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 10:03 [PATCH 0/6] ARC: spinlocks/atomics rework Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] Revert "ARCv2: STAR 9000837815 workaround hardware exclusive transactions livelock" Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARC: refactor atomic inline asm operands with symbolic names Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based spin_lock Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 11:44 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 10:03 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2015-08-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARC: LLOCK/SCOND based rwlock Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 11:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock/atomics: Delayed retry of failed SCOND with exponential backoff Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:01 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 13:50 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 13:02 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARCv2: spinlock/rwlock: Reset retry delay when starting a new spin-wait cycle Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-03 14:40 ` Vineet Gupta
2015-08-03 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438596188-10875-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=arc-linux-dev@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox