From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tomer Barletz <barletz@gmail.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_sx4: Check return code from pdc20621_i2c_read()
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:09:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438628961.4601.2.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-S75BnJJvNsEN3xFrtO9xO=4=UnwJeL6UHLeMbOaSyjk4Htw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 12:04 -0700, Tomer Barletz wrote:
> I see how it makes sense to add a tab to align with the previous line
> of code, as it will always look similar in all editors, no matter how
> their tab character is set up to be.
> However, adding more tabs will just mess up editors that are not set
> up with 8-space width tabs.
>
> Is this a bug in checkpatch.pl, or are we saying everyone should have
> their editor set to 8-spaces width tabs?
from Documentation/CodingStyle:
Chapter 1: Indentation
Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8 characters.
There are heretic movements that try to make indentations 4 (or even 2!)
characters deep, and that is akin to trying to define the value of PI to
be 3.
Rationale: The whole idea behind indentation is to clearly define where
a block of control starts and ends. Especially when you've been looking
at your screen for 20 straight hours, you'll find it a lot easier to see
how the indentation works if you have large indentations.
Now, some people will claim that having 8-character indentations makes
the code move too far to the right, and makes it hard to read on a
80-character terminal screen. The answer to that is that if you need
more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix
your program.
In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added
benefit of warning you when you're nesting your functions too deep.
Heed that warning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-02 10:12 [PATCH] Check return code from pdc20621_i2c_read() Tomer Barletz
2015-08-02 11:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
[not found] ` <CAO-S75CRyh=FPbeTJMZWiYTvpd_wn57f4eGQgOHW2p16+9ANhQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-08-02 17:55 ` Tomer Barletz
2015-08-02 18:03 ` Joe Perches
2015-08-02 20:22 ` Joe Perches
2015-08-03 15:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-03 15:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] sata_sx4: " Tomer Barletz
2015-08-03 18:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-03 19:04 ` Tomer Barletz
2015-08-03 19:09 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-08-03 19:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-03 19:18 ` Tomer Barletz
2015-08-06 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-03 6:06 ` [PATCH] " Tomer Barletz
2015-08-03 15:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438628961.4601.2.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=barletz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox