From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755807AbbHCWvN (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:51:13 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:28169 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbbHCWvL (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:51:11 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,604,1432623600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="618605863" Message-ID: <1438642268.3467.8.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] igb/ixgbe: Fix ordering of SR-IOV teardown From: Jeff Kirsher To: David Miller Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:51:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150729.143141.657802657776347202.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150727223753.10121.78169.stgit@gimli.home> <20150729.121630.2264285348757503000.davem@davemloft.net> <1438198387.13460.68.camel@redhat.com> <20150729.143141.657802657776347202.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Znj5ZkUWedCLUKj/o3HY" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-Znj5ZkUWedCLUKj/o3HY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 14:31 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Alex Williamson > Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:33:07 -0600 >=20 > > I expect that's because of this patch that's in Jeff's dev-queue branch= : > >=20 > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/com= mit/?h=3Ddev-queue&id=3Dddf766a812a13eca1116b5905e902184904266f9 > >=20 > > I based these patches off that branch, assuming they'd take the same > > route and avoid the merge conflict. If you'd rather take these, I'll b= e > > happy to respin. Apologies for not noting the base branch in the > > series. Thanks, >=20 > No, that's fine, this would normally go via Jeff's tree anyways. >=20 > I just didn't see him take it so I assumed that it should go via me. Sorry, was on vacation last week and cell coverage was spotty where I was at. I have picked up the series. --=-Znj5ZkUWedCLUKj/o3HY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJVv/BdAAoJEOVv75VaS+3OHX4P/2A8GRtZgjCKmHUJvxOm8F8D r84JE02DvkVuSwPGYxGePBXmJ9y+IGljGKKnx51mEjimLaGbnc7O+mHaJzPduXxR Kvvbyf4u7wPhei2eqRq7b9HF6rLiP9N7HoadJJ0ZFXA5FJqryH0u+tbpQ6yTxGUH Gw8xJf/YDfuvageb+Q5kejeKSQx8IoJsfvK4d+ZMDEhjwp0vgP8g+qzDgYqnrKnW L9v9Ah6lr/ISF4Ds9do8t+GCWDO9BolS0eMY+cwIhvJC6ymkJpIMRtfaXVmSS1tl LTg0aHan+IBOv6LXiwTdh3oQan6/yW3nw1Y9ocnIr2qGT/+LPjg89GmNF48wuXT2 6pnTjHdnsPDpwnFvtKrOxX3Xhyxh1lHeRQkyEq3plJ/VLRIjV6H+8DY+s667DKYm 3zkY7q73B+OihGgLp6JRf4mYJRvzSjk9N5b9p5/AX1fCk1X2STH84r1ASnnii42J hIDC7dOEFUbttb3oGYwxLRHlhT+KWr3fHv22JBbAs9RELWsZnqWXOOoqM/UNLHit +9p7lkeFbtYngaG9KkP+85MOxfTz+Kjaos7caPt59goAD6Q8wIvkFOFYPk4TLPXj CvVYHhlONDgXgBZc8ZtJ+hjpj11U+6R1ABTrXlFuy4L/4wjVsIQI9EUy4Ac/BNlr hc2sHyt86EXwKJrp6s94 =KibN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Znj5ZkUWedCLUKj/o3HY--