From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: Re: h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:16:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440526586.2120.0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150825180252.GA13318@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 20:02 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 08/26, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > > gcc bug #67055.
> > > Already fixed in trunk.
> >
> > Yes, thanks a lot.
> >
> > Paul, it seems that gcc actually dislikes your ec90a194a "rcu:
> > Create a synchronize_rcu_mult()" commit ;) rcu/sync.c was just
> > lucky enough to trigger the problem.
> >
> > I'll try to make the fix today...
>
> Mark, Guenter, any chance you can check if the patch below helps?
> It does on x86.
Works for c6x.
>
> Oleg.
>
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n,
> call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
> struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
>
> #define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
> -do { \
> - call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
> - const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
> - struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
> - \
> - __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
> +do {
> \
> + call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ };
> \
> + struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array)];
> \
> + __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array),
> \
> + __crcu_array, __rs_array);
> \
> } while (0)
>
> #define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 18:34 h8300 build failures ijn linux-next Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 5:56 ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 14:27 ` Mark Salter
2015-08-25 15:03 ` h8300 build failures in linux-next (in rcu code, gcc 5.x related, not limited to h8300) Guenter Roeck
2015-08-25 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 16:51 ` Yoshinori Sato
2015-08-25 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 18:16 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2015-08-25 18:45 ` [PATCH] rcu: change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around gcc 67055 bug Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-25 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-25 19:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440526586.2120.0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox