public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:56:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440773773.2202.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440699420-30499-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 20:16 +0200, mhocko@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> b9d5c6b7ef57 ("[SCSI] cleanup setting task state in

Heh, it's tempting to revert that.  The reason is we always need to be
interruptible state before we check the flag to avoid missing wakeups.

> scsi_error_handler()") has introduced a race between scsi_error_handler
> and scsi_host_dev_release resulting in the hang when the device goes
> away because scsi_error_handler might miss a wake up:
> 
> CPU0					CPU1
> scsi_error_handler			scsi_host_dev_release
>   					  kthread_stop()
>   kthread_should_stop()
>     test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
> 					    set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
> 					    wake_up_process()
> 					    wait_for_completion()
> 
>   set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
>   schedule()
> 
> The most straightforward solution seems to be to invert the ordering of
> the set_current_state and kthread_should_stop.
> 
> The issue has been noticed during reboot test on a 3.0 based kernel but
> the current code seems to be affected in the same way.
> 
> Cc: stable # 3.6+
> Reported-and-Debugged-by: Mike Mayer <Mike.Meyer@teradata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 6457a8a0db9c..2c0a817d5dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -2169,8 +2169,11 @@ int scsi_error_handler(void *data)
>  	 * We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
>  	 * disables signal delivery for the created thread.
>  	 */
> -	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> +	while (true) {

Comment here, I think, please to avoid any other erroneous tidying
attempts.  How about

/* 
 * The sequence in kthread_stop() sets the stop flag first then 
 * wakes the process.  To avoid missed wakeups, the task should always
 * be in a non running state before the stop flag is checked
 */

Otherwise this looks fine.

James

>  		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		if (kthread_should_stop())
> +			break;
> +
>  		if ((shost->host_failed == 0 && shost->host_eh_scheduled == 0) ||
>  		    shost->host_failed != atomic_read(&shost->host_busy)) {
>  			SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(1,




  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-28 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-27 18:16 [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race mhocko
2015-08-27 18:28 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-28  6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-08-28 14:56 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2015-08-28 15:17   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1440773773.2202.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox