From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 9/9] rcu: Change _wait_rcu_gp() to work around GCC bug 67055
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:36:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440819361-20251-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440819361-20251-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Code like this in inline functions confuses some recent versions of gcc:
const int n = const-expr;
whatever_t array[n];
For more details, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055#c13
This compiler bug results in the following failure after 114b7fd4b (rcu:
Create rcu_sync infrastructure):
In file included from include/linux/rcupdate.h:429:0,
from include/linux/rcu_sync.h:5,
from kernel/rcu/sync.c:1:
include/linux/rcutiny.h: In function 'rcu_barrier_sched':
include/linux/rcutiny.h:55:20: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
static inline void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
This commit therefore eliminates the constant local variable in favor of
direct use of the expression.
Reported-and-tested-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index ff476515f716..581abf848566 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
#define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
-do { \
- call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
- const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
- struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
- \
- __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
+do { \
+ call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
+ struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array)]; \
+ __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array), \
+ __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
} while (0)
#define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)
--
1.8.1.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-29 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-29 3:26 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/9] Add rcu_sync and implement percpu_rwsem in terms of it Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/9] rcu_sync: Simplify rcu_sync using new rcu_sync_ops structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcu_sync: Add CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-07 9:02 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-09-07 12:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-08 23:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/9] rcu_sync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/9] locking/percpu-rwsem: Make percpu_free_rwsem() after kzalloc() safe Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/9] locking/percpu-rwsem: Make use of the rcu_sync infrastructure Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 7/9] locking/percpu-rwsem: Fix the comments outdated by rcu_sync Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:36 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 8/9] locking/percpu-rwsem: Clean up the lockdep annotations in percpu_down_read() Paul E. McKenney
2015-08-29 3:36 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440819361-20251-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).