From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752791AbbIKOzL (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:55:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:63375 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751875AbbIKOzK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:55:10 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,511,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="299460670" Message-ID: <1441983304.3549.73.camel@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/xen: Enable user access to the kernel before issuing a privcmd call From: Ian Campbell To: Julien Grall , CC: , , , "Riku Voipio" , Russell King Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:55:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55F2E909.70600@citrix.com> References: <1441980963-9002-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1441981760.3549.57.camel@citrix.com> <55F2E909.70600@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 15:45 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > On 11/09/15 15:29, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 15:16 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > > > When Xen is copyin data to/from the guest it will check if the kernel > > > > "copying" > > > > > has the right to do the access. If not, the hypercall will return an > > > error. > > > > > > After the commit a5e090acbf545c0a3b04080f8a488b17ec41fe02 "ARM: > > > software-based priviledged-no-access support", the kernel can't > > > access > > > > "privileged" > > > > > anymore the user space by default. This will result to fail on every > > > > "any more" (or "any longer") > > > > > hypercall made by the userspace (i.e via privcmd). > > > > > > We have to enable the userspace access and then restore the correct > > > permission everytime the privmcd is used to made an hypercall. > > > > "every time" and "privcmd" > > > > > HYPERCALL1(tmem_op); > > > HYPERCALL2(multicall); > > > > > > -ENTRY(privcmd_call) > > > +ENTRY(__privcmd_call) > > > > arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h seems to contain uaccess_* macros > > which > > could be used right here directly I think? That would be preferable to > > wrapping I think. > > Looking to the uaccess_save macro: I was thinking more about uaccess_enable/disable. Ian.