From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752986AbbIKOzS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:55:18 -0400
Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:36947 "EHLO sipsolutions.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751875AbbIKOzQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:55:16 -0400
Message-ID: <1441983308.2083.13.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: static key arrays?
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87zj0taui1.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (sfid-20150911_164128_138967_59961D8F)
References: <1441964735.2083.4.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <20150911111003.GK18489@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
	 <1441973699.2083.6.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <87zj0taui1.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (sfid-20150911_164128_138967_59961D8F)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:41 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 
> That's inconvenient for large arrays. I think the 'or something' would
> be the range initialization supported by gcc (and I think also clang):
> 
> struct static_key_false array[N] = { [0 ... N-1] = STATIC_KEY_FALSE_INIT };
> 

Ah, I wasn't aware of that extension. That's indeed much more
convenient than the CPP trick I was thinking of :)

johannes