From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:54:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:54:39 -0400 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:18678 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:54:38 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <3CD134B6.6090504@evision-ventures.com> To: Martin Dalecki Cc: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:54:24 +0100 Message-ID: <14420.1020347664@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dalecki@evision-ventures.com said: > No I was consciuous: I just saw some macro preprocessing clashes. But not conscious enough to bother to Cc the maintainer or explain the clashes you saw? Do what you like; I'm ignoring 2.5 until Marcelo gets 2.4.19 out and I can send him the rest of the code I'm sitting on for 2.4.20-pre1; at which point I'll update everything in my tree to build against 2.5 and require magic in compatmac.h for the 2.4 build, and I'll look at what's changed then. -- dwmw2