From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754187AbbIRU1H (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:27:07 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59605 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753691AbbIRU1F (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:27:05 -0400
Message-ID: <1442607936.7469.1.camel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add spurious wakeup quirk for Lynxpoint controllers
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:25:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <55FC4221.907@redhat.com>
References: <1441906034-5033-1-git-send-email-labbott@fedoraproject.org>
	 <55FBE50A.6060001@intel.com> <55FC4221.907@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:56 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Would you rather see a revert of the patch you gave rather than a new
> one re-introducing the flag?

We need a big fat comment here saying that different tests should
different results and the quirk is needed for LynxPoint. That
suggests a new patch.

	Regards
		Oliver