From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754219AbbIWLI1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 07:08:27 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:59246 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754042AbbIWLI0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 07:08:26 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,577,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="811128610" From: "Lankhorst, Maarten" To: "davej@codemonkey.org.uk" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Roper, Matthew D" , "Vetter, Daniel" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" , "airlied@linux.ie" , "Miramontes Caton, Jairo Daniel" , "jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3 Thread-Topic: [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3 Thread-Index: AQHQ9UknSSIer1Md7EiTtsB8A+ww+Z5IqJgAgACgJYCAAJwegA== Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:07:56 +0000 Message-ID: <1443006475.22058.1.camel@intel.com> References: <20150907184559.GA18393@codemonkey.org.uk> <20150921184849.GA25222@codemonkey.org.uk> <56016D01.5010708@virtuousgeek.org> <20150922151355.GX3383@phenom.ffwll.local> <20150922161558.GB24128@intel.com> <20150923014909.GA18010@codemonkey.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150923014909.GA18010@codemonkey.org.uk> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.252.5.159] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <609F0B45326CC94D924215BA6C771111@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id t8NB8W0d015428 Hey, Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of > > > > their recent patches. > > > > Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might > > have seen similar problems while working on atomic watermarks; the > > issues I was seeing were because the initial hardware readout could > > leave primary->visible set to true even when the CRTC was off. My > > series (which is still under development) contains this patch to fix > > that: > > > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/59564/ > > > > Does applying that help with the problems reported here? > > No difference at all for me. Looks like a (reopened) dup of 91952? Can you apply "[PATCH] drm/i915: Add primary plane to mask if it's visible", and get me the results? ~Maarten --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel International B.V. Registered in The Netherlands under number 34098535 Statutory seat: Haarlemmermeer Registered address: Capronilaan 37, 1119NG Schiphol-Rijk This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I