From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754735AbbIWM5C (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:57:02 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:55669 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753228AbbIWM46 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:56:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,577,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="811185544" Message-ID: <1443013012.8361.172.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] pwm-pca9685: enable ACPI device found on Galileo Gen2 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Wolfram Sang , Linus Walleij , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , "Puustinen, Ismo" , "Pandruvada, Srinivas" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:56:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20150923124800.GA11187@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1442916619-140607-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1442916619-140607-9-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150922143714.GA9235@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1442997686.8361.161.camel@linux.intel.com> <20150923124800.GA11187@ulmo.nvidia.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 14:48 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:41:26AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 16:37 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:10:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > .of_match_table = pca9685_dt_ids, > > > > > > Similarly to the above, this should use of_match_ptr(), which in > > > turn > > > will require #ifdef protection for the table to avoid warnings. > > > > Hmm... my patch do not touches that part. Perhaps another patch for > > this? > > Your patch does touch that part by removing the dependency on OF. > That > makes it possible to build this code with !OF, which in turn would > make > the OF match table unused. Ah, you're right. Will amend this part as well. Thanks! > > Thierry -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy