From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932584AbbJICkZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:40:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:34882 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932354AbbJICkY (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:40:24 -0400 Message-ID: <1444358421.3232.78.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks From: Mike Galbraith To: paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 04:40:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <201510082155.t98LtgRB002737@como.maths.usyd.edu.au> References: <201510082155.t98LtgRB002737@como.maths.usyd.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 08:55 +1100, paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au wrote: > >> Good to see that you agree ... > > Weeell, we've disagreed on pretty much everything ... > > Sorry I disagree: we do agree on the essence. :-) P.S. To some extent. If the essence is $subject, nope, we definitely disagree. If the essence is that _group_ scheduling is not strictly fair, then we agree. The must be fixed bit, I also disagree with. Maybe wants fixing I can agree with ;-) -Mike