From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444488086.2804.13.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510102230.EuRy5bIi%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 22:03 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Mike,
Hi there pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey bot. Eeee Ahhh :)
sched: disable task group wide utilization based weight on the desktop
Task group wide utilization based weight may work well for servers, but it
is horrible on the desktop. 8 groups of 1 hog demoloshes interactivity, 1
group of 8 hogs has noticable impact, 2 such groups is very very noticable.
Turn it off if autogroup is enabled, and add a feature to let people set the
definition of fair to what serves them best. For the desktop, fixed group
weight wins hands down, no contest....
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuit@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
kernel/sched/features.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
kernel/sched/features.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2372,6 +2372,8 @@ static long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_r
{
long tg_weight, load, shares;
+ if (!sched_feat(SMP_FAIR_GROUPS))
+ return tg->shares;
tg_weight = calc_tg_weight(tg, cfs_rq);
load = cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq);
@@ -2423,6 +2425,9 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if (likely(se->load.weight == tg->shares))
return;
+#else
+ if (!sched_feat(SMP_FAIR_GROUPS) && se->load.weight == tg->shares)
+ return;
#endif
shares = calc_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, tg);
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -88,3 +88,17 @@ SCHED_FEAT(LB_MIN, false)
*/
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA, true)
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+/*
+ * With SMP_FAIR_GROUPS set, activity group wide determines share for
+ * all froup members. This does very bad things to interactivity when
+ * a desktop box is heavily loaded. Default to off when autogroup is
+ * enabled, and let all users set it to what works best for them.
+ */
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
+SCHED_FEAT(SMP_FAIR_GROUPS, true)
+#else
+SCHED_FEAT(SMP_FAIR_GROUPS, false)
+#endif
+#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-10 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-05 21:48 CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks paul.szabo
2015-10-06 2:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-06 10:06 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-06 12:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-06 20:44 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-07 1:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 8:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 10:54 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-08 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-10 13:22 ` [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop Mike Galbraith
2015-10-10 14:03 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-10 14:41 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-10-10 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-10 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-11 2:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 17:42 ` 4.3 group scheduling regression Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 7:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 0:53 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 2:12 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12 10:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 19:55 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13 4:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 20:42 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13 8:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 0:35 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 0:37 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 19:32 ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 2:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 8:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-10 20:14 ` [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop paul.szabo
2015-10-11 2:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 9:25 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-11 12:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 19:46 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-12 1:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 14:25 ` CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 21:55 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-09 1:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-09 2:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 9:43 ` paul.szabo
2015-10-10 3:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-10-10 7:58 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444488086.2804.13.camel@gmail.com \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).