From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: algif_hash: splice of data > 2**16
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 16:12:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444883.Oc8SnflNUU@tachyon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549AC946.2000909@c-s.fr>
Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2014, 15:10:14 schrieb leroy christophe:
Hi leroy,
> Le 24/12/2014 10:03, Stephan Mueller a écrit :
> > Am Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014, 18:16:01 schrieb leroy christophe:
> >
> > Hi leroy,
> >
> >> Le 20/12/2014 07:37, Stephan Mueller a écrit :
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2014, 13:22:20 schrieb leroy christophe:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Christophe,
> >>>
> >>>> Le 18/12/2014 13:15, Stephan Mueller a écrit :
> >>>>> Hi Herbert,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While testing the vmsplice/splice interface of algif_hash I was made
> >>>>> aware of the problem that data blobs larger than 16 pages do not seem
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> be hashed properly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For testing, a file is mmap()ed and handed to vmsplice / splice. If
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> file is smaller than 2**16, the interface returns the proper hash.
> >>>>> However, when the file is larger, only the first 2**16 bytes seem to
> >>>>> be
> >>>>> used.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When adding printk's to hash_sendpage, I see that this function is
> >>>>> invoked exactly 16 times where the first 15 invocations have the
> >>>>> MSG_MORE flag set and the last invocation does not have MSG_MORE.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Stephan,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have already noticed the same issue and proposed a patch, but I never
> >>>> got any feedback and it has never been merged, allthought I pinged it a
> >>>> few times.
> >>>>
> >>>> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/18/276
> >>>
> >>> After testing, this patch does not work for me. The operation still
> >>> stops
> >>> after 16 pages.
> >>
> >> Yes, it looks like the function I fixed is exclusively used by
> >> sendfile() system call.
> >> So there is probably the same kind of fix to be done in another function.
> >
> > I do not believe that is the case. IMHO the blocking issue is found in the
> > following code:
> >
> > splice_from_pipe_feed walks the pipe->nrbufs. And vmsplice_to_pipe defines
> > the maximum number of nrbufs as PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS -- which is 16. As
> > subsequent functions allocate memory based on PIPE_DEF_BUFFERS, there is
> > no trivial way to increase the number of pages to be processed.
> >
> > Thus I see that the vmsplice/splice combo can at most operate on a chunk
> > of 16 pages. Thus, you have to segment your input buffer into chunks of
> > that size and invoke the vmsplice/splice syscalls for each segment.
>
> Yes your are probably right. There splice needs to be called with
> SPLICE_F_MORE flag, hope that works.
That is not the only one. Vmsplice works on a pipe. A pipe is backed by 16
pages max. Thus, you have to call vmsplice once per 16 pages. The current code
I am testing which seems to work is the following:
while (inlen) {
size_t datalen = (inlen > MAXLEN) ? MAXLEN : inlen;
iov.iov_len = datalen;
ret = _kcapi_common_vmsplice_data(handle, &iov, 1, datalen,
1);
if (0 > ret)
return ret;
processed += ret;
iov.iov_base = (void*)(uintptr_t)(in + processed);
inlen -= ret;
}
return _kcapi_common_read_data(handle, out, outlen);
--
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-24 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-18 12:15 algif_hash: splice of data > 2**16 Stephan Mueller
2014-12-18 12:22 ` leroy christophe
2014-12-18 12:37 ` Stephan Mueller
2014-12-20 6:37 ` Stephan Mueller
2014-12-23 17:16 ` leroy christophe
2014-12-24 9:03 ` Stephan Mueller
2014-12-24 14:10 ` leroy christophe
2014-12-24 15:12 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2014-12-25 22:08 ` Stephan Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444883.Oc8SnflNUU@tachyon.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox