Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] smack: namespace groundwork

[Lukasz Pawelczyk <l.pawelczyk@samsung.com>]

On czw, 2015-10-15 at 15:38 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > 
> > +static inline void smack_userns_free(struct user_namespace *ns)
> > +{
> > +	struct smack_ns *snsp = ns->security;
> > +	struct smack_known *skp;
> > +	struct smack_known_ns *sknp, *n;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(sknp, n, &snsp->smk_mapped,
> > smk_list_ns) {
> > +		skp = sknp->smk_unmapped;
> > +
> > +		mutex_lock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);
> > +		list_del_rcu(&sknp->smk_list_known);
> > +		if (sknp->smk_allocated)
> > +			kfree(sknp->smk_mapped);
> > +		kfree(sknp);
> 
> sknp is released,
> > +		mutex_unlock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);
> > +
> > +		list_del(&sknp->smk_list_ns);
> 
> but it is used again! typo?

No, not a typo. A regular bug. Thanks for spotting it. Also sync
mechanism before freeing was missing:

	skp = sknp->smk_unmapped;

	mutex_lock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);
	list_del_rcu(&sknp->smk_list_known);
	mutex_unlock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);

	list_del(&sknp->smk_list_ns);

	call_rcu(&sknp->smk_rcu, smk_free_known_ns);


-- 
Lukasz Pawelczyk
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics