From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753200AbbJOTA3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:00:29 -0400 Received: from g2t4625.austin.hp.com ([15.73.212.76]:57170 "EHLO g2t4625.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752181AbbJOTA2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1444935623.29506.14.camel@j-VirtualBox> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] timer: Improve itimers scalability From: Jason Low To: George Spelvin Cc: jason.low2@hp.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave@stgolabs.net, fweisbec@gmail.com, hideaki.kimura@hpe.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, scott.norton@hpe.com, terry.rudd@hpe.com Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:00:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20151014211827.739.qmail@ns.horizon.com> References: <20151014211827.739.qmail@ns.horizon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 17:18 -0400, George Spelvin wrote: > I'm going to give 4/4 a closer look to see if the races with timer > expiration make more sense to me than last time around. > (E.g. do CPU time signals even work in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL?) > > But although I haven't yet convinced myself the current code is right, > the changes don't seem to make it any worse. So consider all four > > Reviewed-by: George Spelvin Thanks George!