linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] perf/bench: Harmonize all the -l/--nr_loops options
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:04:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445241870-24854-13-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445241870-24854-1-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>

We have three benchmarking subsystems that specify some sort of
'number of loops' parameter - but all of them do it inconsistently:

 numa:              -l/--nr_loops
 sched messaging:   -l/--loops
 mem memset/memcpy: -i/--iterations

Harmonize them to -l/--nr_loops by picking the numa variant - which
is also the most likely one to have existing scripting which we don't
want to break.

Plus improve the parameter help texts to indicate the default value
for the nr_loops variable to keep users from guessing ...

Also propagate the naming to internal variables.

Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c   | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 tools/perf/bench/numa.c            |  4 ++--
 tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
index f701b5b56079..65e7297de4b1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
@@ -25,20 +25,20 @@
 
 static const char	*size_str	= "1MB";
 static const char	*routine_str	= "all";
-static int		iterations	= 1;
+static int		nr_loops	= 1;
 static bool		use_cycles;
 static int		cycles_fd;
 
 static const struct option options[] = {
-	OPT_STRING('l', "size", &size_str, "1MB",
+	OPT_STRING('s', "size", &size_str, "1MB",
 		    "Specify the size of the memory buffers. "
 		    "Available units: B, KB, MB, GB and TB (case insensitive)"),
 
 	OPT_STRING('r', "routine", &routine_str, "all",
 		    "Specify the routine to run, \"all\" runs all available routines, \"help\" lists them"),
 
-	OPT_INTEGER('i', "iterations", &iterations,
-		    "Repeat the function this number of times"),
+	OPT_INTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops,
+		    "Specify the number of loops to run. (default: 1)"),
 
 	OPT_BOOLEAN('c', "cycles", &use_cycles,
 		    "Use a cycles event instead of gettimeofday() to measure performance"),
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *
 		init_cycles();
 
 	size = (size_t)perf_atoll((char *)size_str);
-	size_total = (double)size * iterations;
+	size_total = (double)size * nr_loops;
 
 	if ((s64)size <= 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid size:%s\n", size_str);
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static u64 do_memcpy_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
 	fn(dst, src, size);
 
 	cycle_start = get_cycles();
-	for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
 		fn(dst, src, size);
 	cycle_end = get_cycles();
 
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static double do_memcpy_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
 	fn(dst, src, size);
 
 	BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_start, NULL));
-	for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
 		fn(dst, src, size);
 	BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL));
 
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static double do_memcpy_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
 	free(src);
 	free(dst);
 
-	return (double)(((double)size * iterations) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
+	return (double)(((double)size * nr_loops) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
 }
 
 struct routine memcpy_routines[] = {
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static u64 do_memset_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
 	fn(dst, -1, size);
 
 	cycle_start = get_cycles();
-	for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
 		fn(dst, i, size);
 	cycle_end = get_cycles();
 
@@ -337,14 +337,14 @@ static double do_memset_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
 	fn(dst, -1, size);
 
 	BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_start, NULL));
-	for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
 		fn(dst, i, size);
 	BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL));
 
 	timersub(&tv_end, &tv_start, &tv_diff);
 
 	free(dst);
-	return (double)(((double)size * iterations) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
+	return (double)(((double)size * nr_loops) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
 }
 
 static const char * const bench_mem_memset_usage[] = {
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 870b7e665a20..492df2752a2d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
 	OPT_STRING('L', "mb_proc_locked", &p0.mb_proc_locked_str,"MB", "process serialized/locked memory access (MBs), <= process_memory"),
 	OPT_STRING('T', "mb_thread"	, &p0.mb_thread_str,	"MB", "thread  memory (MBs)"),
 
-	OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops"	, &p0.nr_loops,		"max number of loops to run"),
-	OPT_UINTEGER('s', "nr_secs"	, &p0.nr_secs,		"max number of seconds to run"),
+	OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops"	, &p0.nr_loops,		"max number of loops to run (default: unlimited)"),
+	OPT_UINTEGER('s', "nr_secs"	, &p0.nr_secs,		"max number of seconds to run (default: 5 secs)"),
 	OPT_UINTEGER('u', "usleep"	, &p0.sleep_usecs,	"usecs to sleep per loop iteration"),
 
 	OPT_BOOLEAN('R', "data_reads"	, &p0.data_reads,	"access the data via writes (can be mixed with -W)"),
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c b/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
index d7f281c2828d..d4ff1b539cfd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 #define DATASIZE 100
 
 static bool use_pipes = false;
-static unsigned int loops = 100;
+static unsigned int nr_loops = 100;
 static bool thread_mode = false;
 static unsigned int num_groups = 10;
 
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static void ready(int ready_out, int wakefd)
 		err(EXIT_FAILURE, "poll");
 }
 
-/* Sender sprays loops messages down each file descriptor */
+/* Sender sprays nr_loops messages down each file descriptor */
 static void *sender(struct sender_context *ctx)
 {
 	char data[DATASIZE];
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void *sender(struct sender_context *ctx)
 	ready(ctx->ready_out, ctx->wakefd);
 
 	/* Now pump to every receiver. */
-	for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; i++) {
 		for (j = 0; j < ctx->num_fds; j++) {
 			int ret, done = 0;
 
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned int group(pthread_t *pth,
 		/* Create the pipe between client and server */
 		fdpair(fds);
 
-		ctx->num_packets = num_fds * loops;
+		ctx->num_packets = num_fds * nr_loops;
 		ctx->in_fds[0] = fds[0];
 		ctx->in_fds[1] = fds[1];
 		ctx->ready_out = ready_out;
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
 	OPT_BOOLEAN('t', "thread", &thread_mode,
 		    "Be multi thread instead of multi process"),
 	OPT_UINTEGER('g', "group", &num_groups, "Specify number of groups"),
-	OPT_UINTEGER('l', "loop", &loops, "Specify number of loops"),
+	OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops, "Specify the number of loops to run (default: 100)"),
 	OPT_END()
 };
 
-- 
2.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19  8:04 [PATCH 00/14] perf bench: Misc improvements Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 01/14] perf/bench: Improve the 'perf bench mem memcpy' code readability Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:43   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 02/14] perf/bench: Default to all routines in 'perf bench mem' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 15:21   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-19 17:47     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:43   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Default to all routines in ' perf " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 03/14] perf/bench: Eliminate unused argument from bench_mem_common() Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:44   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 04/14] perf/bench: Rename 'mem-memcpy.c' => 'mem-functions.c' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 18:35   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-19 18:37     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-20  7:44   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Rename 'mem-memcpy.c' => ' mem-functions.c' tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 05/14] perf/bench: Remove the prefaulting complication from 'perf bench mem mem*' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:44   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 06/14] perf/bench: List output formatting options on 'perf bench -h' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 13:28   ` David Ahern
2015-10-19 18:51     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-20  7:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: List output formatting options on ' perf " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 07/14] perf/bench/mem: Change 'cycle' to 'cycles' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 08/14] perf/bench/mem: Rename 'routine' to 'routine_str' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 13:34   ` David Ahern
2015-10-19 18:54     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-19 18:56       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-19 19:09         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 19:20           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-19 19:21             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-20  7:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 09/14] perf/bench/mem: Fix 'length' vs. 'size' naming confusion Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 10/14] perf/bench/mem: Improve user visible strings Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 11/14] perf/bench/mem: Reorganize the code a bit Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-20  7:47   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Harmonize all the -l/ --nr_loops options tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 13/14] perf/bench/mem: Rename 'routine' to 'function' Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:47   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench mem: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19  8:04 ` [PATCH 14/14] perf/bench: Run benchmarks, don't test them Ingo Molnar
2015-10-20  7:47   ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-10-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 00/14] perf bench: Misc improvements David Ahern
2015-10-19 19:01   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445241870-24854-13-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).