linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "jmoyer@redhat.com" <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>, "jack@suse.com" <jack@suse.com>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:57:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445554654.17208.14.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49oafqfwdi.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 2680 bytes --]

On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:04 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > dax_clear_blocks is currently performing a cond_resched() after every
> > PAGE_SIZE memset.  We need not check so frequently, for example md-raid
> > only calls cond_resched() at stripe granularity.  Also, in preparation
> > for introducing a dax_map_atomic() operation that temporarily pins a dax
> > mapping move the call to cond_resched() to the outer loop.
> 
> There's nothing wrong with the mechanics here, but why bother?  I only
> see 1 caller in the kernel, and that caller passes in
> 1<<inode->i_blkbits for the size (so 1 page or less).  Did you plan to
> add other callers?  I don't see them in this particular patch set.
> 
> Again, I'm not taking issue with the patch, I'm just wondering what
> motivated the change.

The motivation is the subsequent patch to wrap all touches of pmem
within a dax_map_atomic() / dax_unmap_atomic() pairing.  If I just do
the straightforward conversion of this function to dax_map_atomic() it
looks something like this:


> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 5dc33d788d50..fa2a2a255d3a 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long size)
>               unsigned long pfn;
>               long count;
>  
> -             count = bdev_direct_access(bdev, sector, &addr, &pfn, size);
> -             if (count < 0)
> -                     return count;
> +             addr = __dax_map_atomic(bdev, sector, size, &pfn, &count);
> +             if (IS_ERR(addr))
> +                     return PTR_ERR(addr);
>               BUG_ON(size < count);
>               while (count > 0) {
>                       unsigned pgsz = PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(addr);
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long size)
>                       sector += pgsz / 512;
>                       cond_resched();
>               }
> +             dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, addr);
>       } while (size);
>  
>       wmb_pmem();

The problem is that intervening call to cond_resched().  I later want to
inject an rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pair to allow flushing active
dax_map_atomic() usages at driver teardown time [1].  But, I think the
patch stands alone as a cleanup outside of that admittedly hidden
motivation.

[1]: "mm, pmem: devm_memunmap_pages(), truncate and unmap ZONE_DEVICE
pages"
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-October/002406.html


ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] block, dax: updates for 4.4 Dan Williams
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 20:48   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 22:29     ` Dan Williams
2015-10-28 21:01       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-27 17:31   ` Ross Zwisler
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations Dan Williams
2015-10-22 21:04   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 22:57     ` Williams, Dan J [this message]
2015-10-28 21:02       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] block, dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic() Dan Williams
2015-10-28 20:15   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] block: introduce bdev_file_inode() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 20:37   ` Jan Kara
2015-10-28 20:16   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Dan Williams
2015-10-28 20:50   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-29  7:14     ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445554654.17208.14.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).