From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753929AbbJ0GIq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:08:46 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:34689 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751147AbbJ0GIo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:08:44 -0400
Message-ID: <1445926121.2909.93.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
 hierarchy
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:08:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20151027060027.GA2888@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <20151001184629.GB26498@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <CAPM31RKx0vT-9VFN=XASYM4iv4U5ZGZW93XRtJd_7mOHwu76NA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20151023222110.GA4390@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1445661367.3218.62.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20151025021829.GA15471@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1445744613.3180.60.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20151027031656.GA11962@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1445924531.2909.79.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20151027054634.GA16310@mtj.duckdns.org>
	 <1445925402.2909.86.camel@gmail.com>
	 <20151027060027.GA2888@mtj.duckdns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 15:00 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:56:42AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Well, if you think certain things are being missed, please speak up.
> > > Not in some media campaign way but with technical reasoning and
> > > justifications.
> > 
> > Inserting a middle-man is extremely unlikely to improve performance.
> 
> I'm not following you at all.  Technical reasoning and justifications
> is a middle-man?

No, user <-> systemd or whatever <-> kernel
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> I don't think anything productive is likely to come out of this
> conversation.  Let's just end this sub-thread.

Agreed.

	-Mike