From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754661AbbJ0XC2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:02:28 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:33122 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754516AbbJ0XC1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:02:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,207,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="589233806" From: "Keller, Jacob E" To: "dan.streetman@canonical.com" , "peter@hurleysoftware.com" CC: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" , "Skidmore, Donald C" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST Thread-Topic: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST Thread-Index: AQHREQkfgnBptUMzq0mtCDcIhzsE356Aal2A Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:02:25 +0000 Message-ID: <1445986945.21669.11.camel@intel.com> References: <20151027183559.GA14014@aiaiai.jf.intel.com> <562FFE71.6090901@hurleysoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <562FFE71.6090901@hurleysoftware.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [134.134.3.123] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <0C1E5DF787D1CC4BB75B5E8483AEA296@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id t9RN2Yfj002998 On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing > > framework > > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch > > (series) > > you submitted to intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org > > > > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass, > > and might be > > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may > > not be > > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a > > default kernel > > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch. > > > > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai > > has detected a > > false positive, please email Jacob Keller > >. > > False positive. > > As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly > longer > delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not > harmful. > > Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose. > > Regards, > Peter Hurley Feel free to ignore this then. Regards, Jake{.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I