From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] CFS idle injection
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:10:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446509428-5616-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi Peter and all,
A while ago, we had discussion about how powerclamp is broken in the
sense of turning off idle ticks in the forced idle period.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/18/369
It was suggested to replace the current kthread play idle loop with a
timer based runqueue throttling scheme. I finally got around to implement
this and code is much simpler. I also have good test results in terms of
efficiency, scalability, etc.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LinuxCon_Japan_2015_idle_injection1_0.pdf
slide #18+ shows the data on client and server.
I have two choices for this code:
1) be part of existing powerclamp driver but require exporting some
sched APIs.
2) be part of sched since the genernal rule applies when it comes down
to sycnhronized idle time for best power savings.
The patches below are for #2. There is a known problem with LOW RES timer
mode that I am working on. But I am hoping to get review earlier.
We are entering a very power limited environment on client side, frequency
scaling can only be efficient at certain range. e.g. on SKL, upto ~900MHz,
anything below, it is increasingly more efficient to do C-states insertion
if coordinated.
Looking forward, there are use case beyond thermal/power capping. I think
we can consolidate ballanced partial busy workload that are evenly
distributed among CPUs.
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Jacob Pan (3):
ktime: add a roundup function
timer: relax tick stop in idle entry
sched: introduce synchronized idle injection
include/linux/ktime.h | 10 ++
include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++
include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 5 +
include/trace/events/sched.h | 23 +++
init/Kconfig | 8 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 345 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 20 +++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
9 files changed, 427 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-03 0:10 Jacob Pan [this message]
2015-11-03 0:10 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ktime: add a roundup function Jacob Pan
2015-11-03 0:10 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] timer: relax tick stop in idle entry Jacob Pan
2015-11-03 0:10 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection Jacob Pan
2015-11-03 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-03 14:16 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-03 16:45 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-05 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 14:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-11-05 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 15:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-11-05 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 18:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-05 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-05 15:32 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-05 16:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-11-05 19:27 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-05 19:32 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-05 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 23:36 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-06 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-06 23:49 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-10 0:19 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-04 6:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] CFS " Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-04 16:58 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-04 17:05 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-11-04 18:43 ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-05 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-06 16:50 ` Punit Agrawal
2015-11-06 19:18 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-09 11:56 ` Punit Agrawal
2015-11-09 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-09 14:43 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-10 10:07 ` Juri Lelli
2015-11-10 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 10:56 ` Juri Lelli
2015-11-09 14:36 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-06 18:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2015-11-06 19:10 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-06 21:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2015-11-09 21:23 ` Jacob Pan
2015-11-09 21:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446509428-5616-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox