public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don't participate in rendezvous process
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449742346-21470-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>

From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>

Intel's MCA implementation broadcasts MCEs to all CPUs on the node.
This poses a problem for offlined CPUs which cannot participate in the
rendezvous process:

  Kernel panic - not syncing: Timeout: Not all CPUs entered broadcast exception handler
  Kernel Offset: disabled
  Rebooting in 100 seconds..

More specifically, Linux does a soft offline of a CPU when writing a 0
to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online, which doesn't prevent the #MC
exception from being broadcasted to that CPU.

Ensure that offline CPUs don't participate in the MCE rendezvous and
clear the RIP valid status bit so that a second MCE won't cause a
shutdown.

Without the patch, mce_start() will increment mce_callin and wait for
all CPUs. Offlined CPUs should avoid participating in the rendezvous
process altogether.

Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449188170-3909-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
[ Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index c5b0d562dbf5..7e8a736d09db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -999,6 +999,17 @@ void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	int flags = MF_ACTION_REQUIRED;
 	int lmce = 0;
 
+	/* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
+	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
+		u64 mcgstatus;
+
+		mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
+		if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
+			mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ist_enter(regs);
 
 	this_cpu_inc(mce_exception_count);
-- 
2.3.5


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 10:12 [PATCH] tip-queue 2015-12-10 Borislav Petkov
2015-12-10 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-12-14  8:18   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Ensure offline CPUs don' t participate in rendezvous process tip-bot for Ashok Raj
2015-12-19  9:15   ` tip-bot for Ashok Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449742346-21470-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox