From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] sched: Account rr tasks
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:38:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450118312-3788-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450118312-3788-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
In order to evaluate the scheduler tick dependency without probing
context switches, we need to know how much SCHED_RR and SCHED_FIFO tasks
are enqueued as those policies don't have the same preemption
requirements.
To prepare for that, let's account SCHED_RR tasks, we'll be able to
deduce SCHED_FIFO tasks as well from it and the total RT tasks in the
runqueue.
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index e3cc163..7e779a7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1142,12 +1142,27 @@ unsigned int rt_se_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
}
static inline
+unsigned int rt_se_rr_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
+{
+ struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+ if (group_rq)
+ return group_rq->rr_nr_running;
+
+ tsk = rt_task_of(rt_se);
+
+ return (tsk->policy == SCHED_RR) ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static inline
void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
int prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
WARN_ON(!rt_prio(prio));
rt_rq->rt_nr_running += rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
+ rt_rq->rr_nr_running += rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
inc_rt_prio(rt_rq, prio);
inc_rt_migration(rt_se, rt_rq);
@@ -1160,6 +1175,7 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
WARN_ON(!rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
rt_rq->rt_nr_running -= rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
+ rt_rq->rr_nr_running -= rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
dec_rt_prio(rt_rq, rt_se_prio(rt_se));
dec_rt_migration(rt_se, rt_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index efd3bfc..6413238 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ static inline int rt_bandwidth_enabled(void)
struct rt_rq {
struct rt_prio_array active;
unsigned int rt_nr_running;
+ unsigned int rr_nr_running;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
struct {
int curr; /* highest queued rt task prio */
--
2.6.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-14 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-14 18:38 [PATCH 0/9] nohz: Tick dependency mask v4 Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] atomic: Export fetch_or() Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-16 16:34 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] nohz: Implement wide kick on top of irq work Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] nohz: New tick dependency mask Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] nohz: Use enum code for tick stop failure tracing message Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched: Migrate sched " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] posix-cpu-timers: Migrate " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-12-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched-clock: " Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-04 17:00 [PATCH 0/9] nohz: Tick dependency mask v5 Frederic Weisbecker
2016-02-04 17:00 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched: Account rr tasks Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450118312-3788-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).