linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bugfix v2 4/5] x86/irq: Fix a race condition between vector assigning and cleanup
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:13:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450880014-11741-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450880014-11741-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>

Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> reported an use after release
issue related to x86 IRQ management code. Please refer to following
link for more information:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1026840.html

Thomas pointed out that it's caused by a race condition between
__assign_irq_vector() and __send_cleanup_vector(). Based on Thomas'
draft patch, we solve this race condition by:
1) Use move_in_progress to signal that an IRQ cleanup IPI is needed
2) Use old_domain to save old CPU mask for IRQ cleanup
3) Use vector to protect move_in_progress and old_domain

This bugfix patch also helps to get rid of that atomic allocation in
__send_cleanup_vector().

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index f648fce39d5e..ab54b296a7d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d,
 	int cpu, err;
 	unsigned int dest;
 
-	if (d->move_in_progress)
+	if (cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
@@ -141,13 +141,14 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d,
 			cpumask_and(used_cpumask, d->domain, vector_cpumask);
 			err = apic->cpu_mask_to_apicid_and(mask, used_cpumask,
 							   &dest);
-			if (err || cpumask_equal(vector_cpumask, d->domain))
+			if (err)
 				break;
-			cpumask_andnot(d->old_domain, d->domain,
-				       vector_cpumask);
-			d->move_in_progress =
-			   cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-			cpumask_copy(d->domain, used_cpumask);
+			d->cfg.dest_apicid = dest;
+			if (!cpumask_equal(vector_cpumask, d->domain)) {
+				cpumask_andnot(d->old_domain, d->domain,
+					       vector_cpumask);
+				cpumask_copy(d->domain, used_cpumask);
+			}
 			break;
 		}
 
@@ -180,22 +181,20 @@ next:
 		/* Found one! */
 		current_vector = vector;
 		current_offset = offset;
-		if (d->cfg.vector) {
+		if (d->cfg.vector)
 			cpumask_copy(d->old_domain, d->domain);
-			d->move_in_progress =
-			   cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-		}
+		d->cfg.vector = vector;
+		d->cfg.dest_apicid = dest;
 		for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask)
 			per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq_to_desc(irq);
-		d->cfg.vector = vector;
 		cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
 		err = 0;
 		break;
 	}
 
 	if (!err) {
-		/* cache destination APIC IDs into cfg->dest_apicid */
-		d->cfg.dest_apicid = dest;
+		cpumask_and(d->old_domain, d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
+		d->move_in_progress = !cpumask_empty(d->old_domain);
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -227,7 +226,7 @@ static int assign_irq_vector_policy(int irq, int node,
 
 static void clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data)
 {
-	struct irq_desc *desc;
+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 	int cpu, vector = data->cfg.vector;
 
 	BUG_ON(!vector);
@@ -236,10 +235,6 @@ static void clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data)
 	data->cfg.vector = 0;
 	cpumask_clear(data->domain);
 
-	if (likely(!data->move_in_progress))
-		return;
-
-	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask) {
 		for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS;
 		     vector++) {
@@ -421,10 +416,13 @@ static void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
 		struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
 
 		data = apic_chip_data(idata);
-		if (!data || !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->domain))
-			continue;
-		vector = data->cfg.vector;
-		per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = desc;
+		if (data) {
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->old_domain);
+			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, data->domain)) {
+				vector = data->cfg.vector;
+				per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = desc;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 	/* Mark the free vectors */
 	for (vector = 0; vector < NR_VECTORS; ++vector) {
@@ -506,20 +504,17 @@ static struct irq_chip lapic_controller = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *data)
 {
-	cpumask_var_t cleanup_mask;
-
-	if (unlikely(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cleanup_mask, GFP_ATOMIC))) {
-		unsigned int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-		for_each_cpu_and(i, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask)
-			apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(i),
-					    IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
-	} else {
-		cpumask_and(cleanup_mask, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
-		apic->send_IPI_mask(cleanup_mask, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
-		free_cpumask_var(cleanup_mask);
-	}
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
+	if (!data->move_in_progress)
+		goto out_unlock;
 	data->move_in_progress = 0;
+	cpumask_and(data->old_domain, data->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
+	if (!cpumask_empty(data->old_domain))
+		apic->send_IPI_mask(data->old_domain, IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR);
+out_unlock:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
 }
 
 void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
@@ -563,14 +558,10 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(void)
 			goto unlock;
 
 		/*
-		 * Check if the irq migration is in progress. If so, we
-		 * haven't received the cleanup request yet for this irq.
+		 * Nothing to cleanup if this cpu is not set
+		 * in the old_domain mask.
 		 */
-		if (data->move_in_progress)
-			goto unlock;
-
-		if (vector == data->cfg.vector &&
-		    cpumask_test_cpu(me, data->domain))
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(me, data->old_domain))
 			goto unlock;
 
 		irr = apic_read(APIC_IRR + (vector / 32 * 0x10));
@@ -586,6 +577,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(void)
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 		__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(me, data->old_domain);
 unlock:
 		raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
 	}
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-23 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-11  7:49 [lkp] [x86/irq] 4c24cee6b2: IP-Config: Auto-configuration of network failed kernel test robot
2015-12-14  6:38 ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-14  6:54   ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2015-12-14  9:54     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15  7:55       ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-15 10:08         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-19 20:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13           ` [Bugfix v2 1/5] x86/irq: Do not reuse struct apic_chip_data.old_domain as temporary buffer Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 2/5] x86/irq: Enhance __assign_irq_vector() to rollback in case of failure Jiang Liu
2015-12-30 18:52               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 3/5] x86/irq: Fix a race window in x86_vector_free_irqs() Jiang Liu
2015-12-29 13:39               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-16 21:16               ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Fix a race " tip-bot for Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 14:13             ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-12-23 18:41               ` [Bugfix v2 4/5] x86/irq: Fix a race condition between vector assigning and cleanup Borislav Petkov
2015-12-30 17:25               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-30 22:50               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 5/5] x86/irq: Trivial cleanups for x86 vector allocation code Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 19:10             ` [Bugfix v2 1/5] x86/irq: Do not reuse struct apic_chip_data.old_domain as temporary buffer Borislav Petkov
2015-12-24  5:15             ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-12-28  8:24               ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-29  3:26                 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-12-24 14:34             ` Joe Lawrence
2016-01-16 21:16             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Do not use " tip-bot for Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450880014-11741-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).