linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bugfix v2 5/5] x86/irq: Trivial cleanups for x86 vector allocation code
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:13:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450880014-11741-5-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450880014-11741-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>

Trivial cleanups for x86 vector allocation code:
1) reorganize apic_chip_data to optimize for size and cache efficiency
2) avoid redundant calling of irq_to_desc()
3) refine code comments

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index ab54b296a7d0..008114d0d2bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -23,9 +23,9 @@
 
 struct apic_chip_data {
 	struct irq_cfg		cfg;
+	u8			move_in_progress : 1;
 	cpumask_var_t		domain;
 	cpumask_var_t		old_domain;
-	u8			move_in_progress : 1;
 };
 
 struct irq_domain *x86_vector_domain;
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct apic_chip_data *legacy_irq_data[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
 
 void lock_vector_lock(void)
 {
-	/* Used to the online set of cpus does not change
+	/* Used to ensure that the online set of cpus does not change
 	 * during assign_irq_vector.
 	 */
 	raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
@@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ static void free_apic_chip_data(struct apic_chip_data *data)
 	}
 }
 
-static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d,
-			       const struct cpumask *mask)
+static int assign_irq_vector(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask)
 {
 	/*
 	 * NOTE! The local APIC isn't very good at handling
@@ -116,11 +115,15 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d,
 	 */
 	static int current_vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + VECTOR_OFFSET_START;
 	static int current_offset = VECTOR_OFFSET_START % 16;
-	int cpu, err;
+	int cpu, err = -EBUSY;
+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_data_to_desc(data);
+	struct apic_chip_data *d = data->chip_data;
 	unsigned int dest;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
 	if (cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask))
-		return -EBUSY;
+		goto out;
 
 	/* Only try and allocate irqs on cpus that are present */
 	err = -ENOSPC;
@@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ next:
 		d->cfg.vector = vector;
 		d->cfg.dest_apicid = dest;
 		for_each_cpu_and(new_cpu, vector_cpumask, cpu_online_mask)
-			per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = irq_to_desc(irq);
+			per_cpu(vector_irq, new_cpu)[vector] = desc;
 		cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
 		err = 0;
 		break;
@@ -196,37 +199,27 @@ next:
 		cpumask_and(d->old_domain, d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
 		d->move_in_progress = !cpumask_empty(d->old_domain);
 	}
-
-	return err;
-}
-
-static int assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data,
-			     const struct cpumask *mask)
-{
-	int err;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
-	err = __assign_irq_vector(irq, data, mask);
+out:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
+
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int assign_irq_vector_policy(int irq, int node,
-				    struct apic_chip_data *data,
+static int assign_irq_vector_policy(struct irq_data *data, int node,
 				    struct irq_alloc_info *info)
 {
 	if (info && info->mask)
-		return assign_irq_vector(irq, data, info->mask);
+		return assign_irq_vector(data, info->mask);
 	if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
-	    assign_irq_vector(irq, data, cpumask_of_node(node)) == 0)
+	    assign_irq_vector(data, cpumask_of_node(node)) == 0)
 		return 0;
-	return assign_irq_vector(irq, data, apic->target_cpus());
+	return assign_irq_vector(data, apic->target_cpus());
 }
 
-static void clear_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *data)
+static void clear_irq_vector(struct irq_data *irq_data)
 {
-	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_data_to_desc(irq_data);
+	struct apic_chip_data *data = irq_data->chip_data;
 	int cpu, vector = data->cfg.vector;
 
 	BUG_ON(!vector);
@@ -274,7 +267,7 @@ static void x86_vector_free_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
 		irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(x86_vector_domain, virq + i);
 		if (irq_data && irq_data->chip_data) {
 			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
-			clear_irq_vector(virq + i, irq_data->chip_data);
+			clear_irq_vector(irq_data);
 			free_apic_chip_data(irq_data->chip_data);
 			irq_domain_reset_irq_data(irq_data);
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
@@ -319,7 +312,7 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 		irq_data->chip = &lapic_controller;
 		irq_data->chip_data = data;
 		irq_data->hwirq = virq + i;
-		err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq + i, node, data, info);
+		err = assign_irq_vector_policy(irq_data, node, info);
 		if (err)
 			goto error;
 	}
@@ -481,8 +474,7 @@ void apic_ack_edge(struct irq_data *data)
 static int apic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
 			     const struct cpumask *dest, bool force)
 {
-	struct apic_chip_data *data = irq_data->chip_data;
-	int err, irq = irq_data->irq;
+	int err;
 
 	if (!config_enabled(CONFIG_SMP))
 		return -EPERM;
@@ -490,7 +482,7 @@ static int apic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
 	if (!cpumask_intersects(dest, cpu_online_mask))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = assign_irq_vector(irq, data, dest);
+	err = assign_irq_vector(irq_data, dest);
 
 	return err ? err : IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
 }
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-23 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-11  7:49 [lkp] [x86/irq] 4c24cee6b2: IP-Config: Auto-configuration of network failed kernel test robot
2015-12-14  6:38 ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-14  6:54   ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2015-12-14  9:54     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-15  7:55       ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-15 10:08         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-19 20:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13           ` [Bugfix v2 1/5] x86/irq: Do not reuse struct apic_chip_data.old_domain as temporary buffer Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 2/5] x86/irq: Enhance __assign_irq_vector() to rollback in case of failure Jiang Liu
2015-12-30 18:52               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 3/5] x86/irq: Fix a race window in x86_vector_free_irqs() Jiang Liu
2015-12-29 13:39               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-16 21:16               ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Fix a race " tip-bot for Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 14:13             ` [Bugfix v2 4/5] x86/irq: Fix a race condition between vector assigning and cleanup Jiang Liu
2015-12-23 18:41               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-30 17:25               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-30 22:50               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-12-23 14:13             ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-12-23 19:10             ` [Bugfix v2 1/5] x86/irq: Do not reuse struct apic_chip_data.old_domain as temporary buffer Borislav Petkov
2015-12-24  5:15             ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-12-28  8:24               ` Jiang Liu
2015-12-29  3:26                 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-12-24 14:34             ` Joe Lawrence
2016-01-16 21:16             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Do not use " tip-bot for Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450880014-11741-5-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trivial@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).