From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752082AbcADTq2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:46:28 -0500 Received: from g1t5424.austin.hp.com ([15.216.225.54]:35506 "EHLO g1t5424.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751523AbcADTqY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:46:24 -0500 Message-ID: <1451936749.19330.22.camel@hpe.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] x86, nvdimm, kexec: Use walk_iomem_res_desc() for iomem search From: Toshi Kani To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Young , Minfei Huang , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Dan Williams Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:45:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160104194059.GM22941@pd.tnic> References: <1451081365-15190-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <1451081365-15190-14-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <20151226103804.GB21988@pd.tnic> <567F315B.8080005@hpe.com> <20151227021257.GA13560@dhcp-128-25.nay.redhat.com> <20151227102406.GB19398@nazgul.tnic> <20160104092937.GB7033@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160104122619.GH22941@pd.tnic> <1451930260.19330.21.camel@hpe.com> <20160104194059.GM22941@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 20:41 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:57:40AM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote: > > With this change, there will be no caller to walk_iomem_res(). Should > > we remove walk_iomem_res() altogether, or keep it for now as a > > deprecated func with the checkpatch check? > > Yes, kill it on the spot so that people don't get crazy ideas. Will do. Thanks! -Toshi