public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	petkan@mip-labs.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:35:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452569755.4776.69.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31702.1452564218@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 02:03 +0000, David Howells wrote:

> See the patch ensubjected:
> 
>   [RFC PATCH 14/15] KEYS: Move the point of trust determination to  __key_link()
> 
> Search for keyring_alloc and particularly restrict_link_by_ima_mok.
> 
> The restriction function cannot currently be cleared or modified by userspace
> - though I have an idea to make it possible to *impose* a restriction through
> keyctl() on any keyring that doesn't yet have a restriction imposed.
> 
> The restriction function can impose any restrictions it likes, using the key's
> parsed payload, key type, the current keyring contents and any other keyring
> contents as it wishes in evaluating the trustworthiness of a key.

One assumption is that ima-mok is always enabled, which isn't true and
not the default.  Depending on whether it is enabled, the ima keyring
would need to be restricted by "restrict_link_by_ima_mok" or
"restrict_link_by_system_trusted".

The IMA MOK and blacklist are restricted to "public_key_restrict_link".
Does this only allow keys signed by keys on the respective keyring or
also by the system keyring? 

As long as the system keyring is limited to just the builtin keys, then
this looks promising.  Otherwise, perhaps a separate "builtin" keyring
should be defined.

Mimi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06 13:45 [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells
2016-01-07  0:04 ` James Morris
2016-01-07  0:34 ` David Howells
2016-01-07  2:13   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-07  3:28     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-07 15:31   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-10 10:36     ` James Morris
2016-01-10 13:26       ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-10 17:46         ` David Howells
2016-01-10 20:33           ` David Howells
2016-01-10 23:55             ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:44               ` David Howells
2016-01-12  1:28                 ` Mark D. Baushke
2016-01-12  2:03                   ` David Howells
2016-01-12  2:25                     ` Mark D. Baushke
2016-01-12  3:35                     ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2016-01-12 10:08                       ` David Howells
2016-01-12 13:21                         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 13:55                           ` David Howells
2016-01-12 15:17                             ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 15:56                               ` David Howells
2016-01-12 16:02                                 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 14:11                         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-10 20:33           ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-12  1:38             ` David Howells
2016-01-12 16:14               ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-12 17:08                 ` David Howells
2016-01-13 16:31                   ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-13 17:51                     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-13 18:01                       ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-13 18:19                       ` David Howells
2016-01-13 18:35                         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-13 18:56                           ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-13 19:19                             ` Petko Manolov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452569755.4776.69.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=mdb@juniper.net \
    --cc=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox