From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752841AbcAMGOT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:14:19 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51611 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbcAMGOS (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1452664413.2403.20.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM64 LPC: update binding doc From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Arnd Bergmann , liviu.dudau@arm.com Cc: Rongrong Zou , Rongrong Zou , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Corey Minyard , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:53:33 +1100 In-Reply-To: <4731036.9QlepWb5cE@wuerfel> References: <568912EE.9030009@huawei.com> <5694E9FF.6030904@huawei.com> <20160112151335.GS13633@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4731036.9QlepWb5cE@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3 (3.18.3-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 23:52 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 12 January 2016 15:13:35 liviu.dudau@arm.com wrote: > > > int of_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index, > > >                          struct resource *r) > > > { > > >       ... > > >       /* flags can be get here, without ranges property reqired. > > >        * if the reg = <0x0 0xe4 4>, I can get flag of > IORESOURCE_MEM, > > >        * if the reg = <0x1 0xe4 4>, I can get flag of > IORESOURCE_IO, > >  > > That is strange, the parent node has #address-cells = <2> so the > first two numbers should be part > > of the address and not influence the flags. Can you add some > debugging in of_get_address() and > > try to figure out what bus is used in  *flags = bus- > >get_flags(prop) ? > >  > >  > > This is the standard ISA binding. The first cell is the address space > (IO or MEM), the second cell is the address within that space. This > is similar to how PCI works. Picking up that mid-way, I have LPC busses on power and am using a similar binding. I'll try to grab some examples and review the document tomorrow (only just noticed it while unpiling emails post- vacation). Cheers, Ben.