From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: <tony.luck@intel.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Reduce number of blocks scanned per bank
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:50:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452901836-27632-4-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452901836-27632-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
>From Fam17h onwards, the number of extended MISC register
blocks is reduced to 4. It is an architectural change
from what we had on earlier processors.
Changing the value of NRBLOCKS here to reflect that change.
Although theoritically the total number of extended MCx_MISC
registers was 8 in earlier processor families, in practice
we only had to use the extra registers for MC4. And only 2 of
those were used. So this change does not affect older processors.
Tested it on Fam10h, Fam15h systems and works fine.
Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
index da570a8..e650fdc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/trace/irq_vectors.h>
-#define NR_BLOCKS 9
+#define NR_BLOCKS 5
#define THRESHOLD_MAX 0xFFF
#define INT_TYPE_APIC 0x00020000
#define MASK_VALID_HI 0x80000000
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 23:50 [PATCH V2 0/5] Updates to AMD MCE driver per Scalable MCA spec Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] x86, mce: Fix order of AMD MCE init function call Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Do not perform shared bank check for future processors Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16 1:01 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-16 1:01 ` [PATCH] x86/mcheck/AMD: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2016-01-15 23:50 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Fix LVT offset configuration for thresholding Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16 10:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-16 10:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-15 23:50 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Set MCAX Enable bit Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2016-01-16 16:05 ` [PATCH V2 0/5] Updates to AMD MCE driver per Scalable MCA spec Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452901836-27632-4-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox