From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752158AbcAUXDw (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:03:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:34961 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383AbcAUXDl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:03:41 -0500 From: John Stultz To: lkml Cc: John Stultz , Sasha Levin , Richard Cochran , Thomas Gleixner , Prarit Bhargava , Harald Hoyer , Kay Sievers , David Herrmann , Shuah Khan Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:03:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1453417415-19110-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET when used with ADJ_NANO. I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced more unit tests to validate these going forward. Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent? Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window if you'd prefer. Let me know if you have any thoughts or objections! thanks -john Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Harald Hoyer Cc: Kay Sievers Cc: David Herrmann Cc: Shuah Khan John Stultz (2): ntp: Fix ADJ_SETOFFSET being used w/ ADJ_NANO kselftests: timers: Add adjtimex SETOFFSET validity tests kernel/time/ntp.c | 14 ++- tools/testing/selftests/timers/valid-adjtimex.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1