From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932790AbcAYOEH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:04:07 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:8191 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932398AbcAYOEB (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:04:01 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,344,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="641082635" Message-ID: <1453730501.2521.222.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: Mans Rullgard , Viresh Kumar , Vinod Koul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Tejun Heo , Dan Williams , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:01:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160125122429.GN6588@sirena.org.uk> References: <1453663322-14474-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <1453663322-14474-4-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <20160124223629.GI6588@sirena.org.uk> <1453710902.2521.203.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160125122429.GN6588@sirena.org.uk> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 12:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the > > > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are > > > the > > > dependencies and so on? > > > Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may > > consider > > this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI > > driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of > > the > > driver. > > And there's no dependency relationship with the rest of the series? Yes, in this particular case. To confirm I even rebased locally the series to be 100% sure. The complete series can be found in https://bitbucket.org/mansr/linux-dwc/branch/dwc-sata -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy