From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966046AbcBDPGU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:06:20 -0500 Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.21]:45564 "EHLO lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965886AbcBDPGT (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:06:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1454598375.14366.72.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: gigaset: memory leak in gigaset_initcshw From: Paul Bolle To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Karsten Keil , "David S. Miller" , gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, Kostya Serebryany , Alexander Potapenko , Sasha Levin Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:06:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1454516189.14366.8.camel@tiscali.nl> <1454526665.14366.22.camel@tiscali.nl> <1454591389.14366.49.camel@tiscali.nl> <1454593604.14366.65.camel@tiscali.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On do, 2016-02-04 at 15:54 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > One TIOCSETD is enough to trigger the leak. > I've tested with different line disciplines and only N_GIGASET_M101 > triggers the leak. So things appear to be just on my plate now. I'll see what I can come up with. Feel free to prod me if I stay silent for too long. Thanks for narrowing things down! Paul Bolle