linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 15:07:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454886441.2329.27.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B7C527.6050300@kernel.dk>

On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 15:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 02/07/2016 09:04 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 10:22 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Keith said it should be on by default, and I promised him to
> > > change
> > > it once we run into problems, which I guess this counts as.
> > > 
> > > But just curious:  what distro are you using?  Upstream systemd
> > > explicitly rejected using scsi_id for NVMe here:
> > > 
> > > 	https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1453
> > > 
> > > and all my test systems don't do this either.
> > 
> > This was SUSE (in my case, openSUSE Leap).  I just checked the
> > source
> > package; they patch the by-id rules back in for NVME:
> > 
> > # PATCH-FIX-SUSE 1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe
> > -devices.patch (bsc#944132)
> > Patch1101:      1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe
> > -devices.patch
> > 
> > The bugzilla is giving access denied for bug id 944132, so it's
> > likely
> > some proprietary vendor problem.  The patch has no preamble, so
> > it's
> > hard to tell what they were thinking.
> 
> I run root-on-nvme on my laptop, and I haven't observed any problems.

Me too apparently.  It looks like this problem may be SUSE specific
unless another distro has enabled this.  I can see why they would: you
do need persistent names for devices, even NVMe ones.

> Generally I hate for options to default y unless absolutely 
> necessary, it's a sure fire way to feature creep your kernel without 
> noticing. I don't think getting all hot about this issue is fair, if 
> the only known case is suse.

Well, OK, I'm annoyed because it was a systemd system which means
debugging boot failures are excruciatingly difficult so it took me a
week and a half to find out what the problem was.  Perhaps I was a bit
rash to label this as an easily foreseen problem.

I opened a bug against SUSE to tell them to turn it on:

https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965497

The second problem is that there's currently no way to transition to
using the serial attribute the way the udev 60-persistent-storage.rules
are written, so if distros have some by-id hack, it will have to be
maintained for a while.  I annotated the already closed bug on this in
systemd with the rules that work for me.

> If anything, let's make the description better. It's trying to be
> funny, it'd be better if it was descriptive and covered this case as
> well.

The problem with this is that when moving to new kernels, distro
maintainers don't read the new option help texts, they just take the
defaults.  However, I checked the only other distribution I use
(debian) and they don't have a nvme persistent ID hack, so if someone
checked ubuntu and Red Hat, I think all the majors are now covered and
perhaps there's no need to do anything more.

James

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-07 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-06 18:33 complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional James Bottomley
2016-02-07  9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-07 16:04   ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 22:28     ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-07 23:07       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-02-08  7:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08  7:32         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 10:01           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 10:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:12               ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:19                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 16:15                   ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:23           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-09 12:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 13:29         ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:14             ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:19               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 15:37         ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08  7:26     ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454886441.2329.27.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).