From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757053AbcBJAdi (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:33:38 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:48169 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757012AbcBJAdf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:33:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1455064413.7576.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/10] ppc64 ftrace: disable profiling for some files From: Michael Ellerman To: Torsten Duwe Cc: Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , Jessica Yu , Steven Rostedt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:33:33 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20160204162114.09AD4692E0@newverein.lst.de> References: <20160204161527.5F3AC692CD@newverein.lst.de> <20160204162114.09AD4692E0@newverein.lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:31 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote: > This patch complements the "notrace" attribute for selected functions. > It adds -mprofile-kernel to the cc flags to be stripped from the command > line for code-patching.o and feature-fixups.o, in addition to "-pg" This could probably be folded into patch 5, and the combined patch would be "remove -mprofile-kernel in all the same places we remove -pg and for the same reasons". I can't think of anywhere we would want to disable -pg but not disable -mprofile-kernel? Or vice versa. cheers