From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755090AbcCBSTT (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:19:19 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0226.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.226]:43775 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbcCBSTS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:19:18 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3868:3871:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12050:12517:12519:12740:13069:13255:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:21212:30012:30054:30064:30070:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: form93_6dad1e604945f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1486 Message-ID: <1456942752.4044.22.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ubifs: Add logging functions for ubifs_msg, ubifs_err and ubifs_warn From: Joe Perches To: Artem Bityutskiy , Adrian Hunter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:19:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <6f81fc68890afcdf53defe70df9b182be9f26df8.1456258476.git.joe@perches.com> References: <6f81fc68890afcdf53defe70df9b182be9f26df8.1456258476.git.joe@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 12:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > The existing logging macros are fairly large and converting the > macros to functions make the object code smaller. Artem and Adrian are the nominal maintainers for ubifs. Artem last had a sign-off on a ubifs patch 6 months ago and Adrian's last one was over 3 years ago. Is there an expected ack/nack/applied handling time for a ubifs patch like this? Should this patch go to someone else? Should the MAINTAINERS entry for ubifs be changed to orphan?